Monday, February 17, 2025

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The City of Ottawa Designates Oromo Irreecha as an Annual Municipal Event

Ottawa, ON - In honour of Black History Month, the Mayor of Ottawa has formally designated Oromo Irreecha as an annual municipal event. This designation represents a pivotal advancement for the Oromo Canadian community, acknowledging the significance of their cultural traditions.

Oromo Irreecha is a traditional Thanksgiving celebration observed by the Oromo people in Ethiopia and globally. This event signifies the conclusion of the rainy season and the commencement of the harvest, embodying themes of gratitude, peace, and prosperity.

The inaugural Irreecha celebration in Ottawa was coordinated by the Oromo Heritage Association of Canada in partnership with the oromo residents of Ottawa on October 5, 2025. The occasion was met with great enthusiasm, uniting Oromo Canadians and their allies in a shared appreciation of the rich cultural heritage of the Oromo people.

Expressing his sentiments, Habtamu Nini Abino, Director of the Oromo Heritage Association of Canada, stated, "We are elated to have Oromo Irreecha recognized as an annual city event. This declaration reflects the diversity and inclusiveness of our city, and we anticipate continuing to share our cultural heritage with the broader community."

The City of Ottawa's acknowledgment of Oromo Irreecha underlines its dedication to fostering cultural diversity and inclusivity. The event will be celebrated annually, offering Oromo Canadians a platform to engage with their heritage and communicate it to the broader community.

For further information, please contact:
Habtamu Nini Abino  
Oromo Heritage Association of Canada  
directorohac@gmail.com  
+1 613-400-8273

Oromummaa: The Resilience of the Oromo Nation Amidst Adversity

Oromummaa: The Resilience of the Oromo Nation Amidst Adversity

The Oromo people, recognised as the largest ethnic group within the Ethiopian empire and among the most populous nations in the Horn of Africa, have faced centuries of marginalisation, oppression, and efforts aimed at the eradication of their identity. Nevertheless, despite such adversities, Oromummaa—the core of Oromo identity, culture, and solidarity—has remained resilient. Despite the legacies of historical injustices, the perseverance of the Oromo people is evident as we actively celebrate our cultural heritage, assert our rights, and strive towards a future where our nation remains robust.

Oromummaa: Beyond Mere Identity

Oromummaa transcends mere identification as Oromo; it represents a profound philosophical framework encompassing our language, culture, history, and the Gadaa system—an indigenous democratic governance structure that predates many contemporary political institutions. It embodies unity, resistance, and the steadfast spirit of the Oromo people, who have and continue to engage in relentless struggles for recognition, freedom, and self-determination.

Historically, there have been systematic attempts to suppress the Oromo language (Afaan Oromo), dismantle cultural institutions, and deny political representation to our people. However, through the sacrifices made by courageous leaders, intellectuals, and freedom fighters, the Oromo have actively resisted these oppressive forces, including the current administration led by Abiy Ahmed. The resurgence of Afaan Oromo in educational, media, and governmental contexts is a profound testament to our enduring resilience.

Endurance in the Face of Subjugation

Generations of the Oromo people have endured political and economic marginalisation, characterised by land dispossession, silenced voices, and questioned identities. Yet, no level of oppression has managed to extinguish the spirit of Oromummaa. The struggles of preceding generations have motivated today’s youth to embrace their cultural heritage with pride and courage.

The Qeerroo Bilisummaa movement, a youth-driven initiative, exemplifies this resilience. Through peaceful protests and calls for justice, .Young Oromos have played an instrumental role in facilitating political transformation, demonstrating that Oromummaa is both vibrant and resilient. Their commitment to the struggle for self-determination and preserving Oromo identity persists until the ultimate objective is attained.

The Global Oromo Nation

The influence of the Oromo nation transcends the confines of the Ethiopian empire. The Oromo diaspora has been pivotal in advocating for human rights, safeguarding cultural heritage, and amplifying the Oromo voice globally. Oromo communities worldwide have established institutions, organised cultural events, and actively supported the pursuit of justice for their homeland.

Through social media, literature, and academic research, Oromo scholars and activists persist in informing the international community about our history, struggles, and aspirations. Consequently, the Oromo issue has evolved from a localised concern that can be silenced by specific authoritarian regimes into a significant topic of international discourse.

A Future Built on Pride and Unity

In the face of challenges, the Oromo people remain united, exhibiting unprecedented strength. Oromummaa is a testament to our historical struggles and a guiding principle for future endeavours. By embracing our identity, fortifying our institutions, and promoting unity, we are charting a path toward a future where the Oromo nation is acknowledged, respected, and empowered.

We take pride in our language, rich traditions, and contributions to global society. We honour our past and present heroes who have sacrificed their lives to uphold the integrity of Oromummaa. Above all, we remain resolute in our conviction that justice, equality, and freedom will ultimately be achieved, leading to the triumph of the Oromo nation. We fervently advocate for the liberation of Oromiyaa.

Regardless of our obstacles, we take pride in our Oromo identity.
Credit to:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/15ouqz2Xd7/

Sunday, February 16, 2025

Why Trump's Third Term Could Be Closer Than You Think

Why Trump's Third Term Could Be Closer Than You Think

By Nikki Thrace • Feb 09, 2025

It's 2028. The ballots are being cast, the nation is holding its breath, and there's a familiar name on the ticket — Donald J. Trump as the Republican nominee.

But wait... wasn't he already elected twice? Can a U.S. president really serve a third term? Once reserved for constitutional scholars and political theorists, this question is now front and center in America's political discourse

The Case for Trump Serving a Third Term

President Donald Trump and his supporters have not been subtle about their interest in extending his time in the White House. While Trump's remarks have often come off as off-the-cuff humour, some supporters have taken concrete steps to test the waters.

One such remark came recently with Trump saying, "It will be the greatest honour of my life to serve not once but twice — or three or four times," before quickly adding, "Nah, it will be to serve twice," as reported by POLITICO.

However, legal experts overwhelmingly agree that the Constitution sets clear barriers to a third term.

Amending the Constitution

Of course, the main obstacle to Trump serving a third term is the Constitution itself. In particular, the 22nd Amendment (ratified in 1951 in the wake of FDR's unprecedented four elections to the highest office) explicitly states: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice."

640px-National Constitution Center-exteriorThe exterior of the National Constitution Center displays the opening words of the United States Constitution. Photo courtesy of Jeffrey M. Vinocur under CC BY 2.5.

Representative Andy Ogles (R-TN) recently introduced a resolution to amend the Constitution to allow a president to serve three terms. He argues that Trump needs more time to accomplish his agenda and undo the Biden administration's actions. "President Trump's decisive leadership starkly contrasts the chaos, suffering, and economic decline Americans have endured over the past four years ... I am proposing an amendment to the Constitution to revise the limitations imposed by the 22nd Amendment on presidential terms. This amendment would allow President Trump to serve three terms, ensuring that we can sustain the bold leadership our nation so desperately needs," Congressman Andy Ogles said in a recent statement, as reported by Ogles.House.Gov.

The bill has not advanced at exploiting Loopholes

Some of Trump's allies, like Steve Bannon, have speculated about a loophole in the 22nd Amendment. The amendment states that no one can be "elected" president more than twice, but it does not explicitly ban someone from serving more than two terms if they weren't elected.

In a speech at the New York Young Republican Club's 112th annual gala, Bannon said, "Donald John Trump is going to raise his hand on the King James Bible and take the oath of office, his third victory and his second term." Bannon continued, "Since it doesn't actually say consecutive, I don't know, maybe we do it again in '28? Are you guys down for that? Trump '28?” as reported by POLITICO.

Here's how it could play out: Trump runs as vice president in 2028 with a Republican ally like JD Vance at the top of the ticket. If they win, Vance could resign, and Trump would assume the presidency — bypassing the two-term election limit. This strategy hinges on interpreting the 22nd Amendment's language literally and assuming the courts wouldn't block it.

Defying the Constitution

Then there's the most audacious scenario: Trump could run for a third term and dare the system to stop him.

This would ignite a legal firestorm, likely ending up in the Supreme Court. Despite Trump's history of challenging norms and legal boundaries — which leads some to believe it's not entirely out of the question — this is a case where constitutional law is firmly The Case Against Trump Serving a Third Term

For all the speculation, the legal barriers to a third term are steep. Here's why most legal experts agree Trump can't — and won't — serve a third term.

The Long Road to Amending

Any member of Congress can introduce an amendment, but getting it to pass is another matter. Short of two-thirds of state legislatures calling for a constitutional convention, an amendment requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House and Senate, followed by ratification from three-fourths of the states. Given the current climate of political polarization, this process is widely regarded as nearly impossible.

Polarization

Legal Challenges Abound

Legal scholars argue that the language of the 22nd Amendment leaves no room for interpretation — two terms, period. Moreover, the 12th Amendment of the Constitution clarifies that anyone ineligible to run for President cannot run for Vice President. Furthermore, historical legal precedent does not support such an interpretation, and the Supreme Court would likely uphold the two-term limit. This renders the creative loophole argument pushed by Bannon and his allies moot.

Even Trump's allies in Congress, like Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), have dismissed the idea of a third term unless the Constitution is amended. "I haven't seen any wiggle room in it," Lee said according to NBC News, emphasizing that any effort to bypass this would likely fail in the courts.

Legal Challenges Would Be Swift and Strong

Legal challenges would flood the courts if Trump attempted to run for a third term through a loophole or outright defiance. The Supreme Court, despite its conservative lean, would face immense pressure to uphold the Constitution. While Trump has previously relied on the courts to back his claims, this could be a different ballgame.

A Long Shot... Or Is It?

Trump's musings about a third term might be more about keeping his supporters energized and his critics on edge than a genuine attempt to stay in power beyond 2028. However, given his boundary-pushing track record, it may be hard to completely dismiss the idea. While the legal hurdles are high, the political drama is likely to continue — and that might be precisely what Trump wants.

 

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Assessing Canada's Strategic Responses to the Uncertainties Associated with the Trump Administration




Assessing Canada's Strategic Responses to the Uncertainties Associated with the Trump Administration
On Wednesday, Canada’s premiers were in Washington, D.C., to underline a "Team Canada" approach and convince U.S. President Donald Trump that tariffs on Canadian products are bad for both Countries.
 
The erratic approach of the Trump administration toward international trade and diplomatic relations has engendered a climate of uncertainty that poses challenges to Canada's economic interests. Consequently, Canada is compelled to explore a range of strategies to safeguard its economy. This analysis examines four potential scenarios: establishing an economic union with the United States, accession to the European Union, the proposition of becoming the 51st state of the United States, and the diversification of trading partnerships.

 Option 1: Formation of an Economic Union with the United States

 Establishing an economic union with the United States would necessitate the integration of Canada's economy with that of its southern neighbour, potentially resulting in a unified market characterised by the unrestricted movement of goods, services, and labour. Although this arrangement may enhance Canada's access to the US market, it would entail substantial concessions, including adopting US trade policies and regulations.

 Advantages: Enhanced market access; potential for economic growth.

 Disadvantages: Erosion of economic sovereignty; risk of cultural and regulatory assimilation. 

 Option 2: Accession to the European Union

 Joining the European Union would afford Canada access to a substantial and stable market, thereby increasing trade and investment prospects. However, this option would require Canada to comply with EU laws and regulations, which may present significant challenges and financial implications.

 Advantages: Access to a large, stable market; potential for heightened trade and investment opportunities.

 Disadvantages: There is a need to adopt EU regulations and a potential compromise of economic sovereignty.

 Option 3: Embracing Statehood as the 51st State of the United States

 The status of becoming the 51st state of the United States would imply Canada surrendering its sovereignty and conforming to the US Constitution. This scenario is highly improbable, as it would necessitate profound alterations to Canada's political and economic framework.

 Advantages: None.

 Disadvantages: Loss of sovereignty, cultural assimilation, potential reduction in economic autonomy.
Option 4: Diversification of Trading Partners

 Diversifying Canada’s trading partners necessitates reducing its reliance on the United States market by enhancing trade relations with other nations, particularly those in Asia, Latin America, and Europe. This strategy would entail substantial investments in trade promotion, infrastructure development, and diplomatic initiatives.

 Advantages: This approach would diminish reliance on the US market while potentially fostering enhanced trade and investment opportunities.  
 Disadvantages:The process may be time-intensive and costly, demanding considerable trade promotion and infrastructure resources.

 Conclusion

 Given the uncertainties associated with Trump's trade policies, Canada must explore multiple strategies to safeguard its economic interests. Although forming an economic union with the United States or joining the European Union might offer improved market access, these options also present considerable risks to Canada’s economic sovereignty. The prospect of Canada becoming the 51st state of the US is implausible and would necessitate profound modifications to its political and economic frameworks.

 In summary, diversifying Canada’s trading partners emerges as the most feasible strategy, as it would lessen dependence on the US market and create avenues for increased trade and investment. Nonetheless, this strategy demands significant investment in trade promotion, infrastructure, and diplomatic efforts. Ultimately, Canada must meticulously evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and devise a comprehensive strategy to uphold its economic interests amidst prevailing uncertainties.
Dominic LeBlanc is the 41st and current finance minister, assuming the role on December 16, 2024, following the resignation of Chrystia Freeland.
Liberal Party of Canada | Parti libéral du Canada 
@highlight
Liberal Party of Canada | Parti libéral du Canada 
@highlight

Friday, February 7, 2025

What is Fascism

By: Habtamu Abino
February 08,2025
Ottawa, ON

Fascism is an extreme right-wing authoritarian political ideology distinguished by dictatorial governance, radical nationalism, and the systematic suppression of opposition. The following are the core components of a fascist state and its leadership:

Components of a Fascist State:

Authoritarian Leadership: This entails the concentration of power within a single, charismatic leader who demands absolute loyalty from their followers. 

Nationalism:A profound allegiance to the nation often characterised by xenophobic sentiments and the assertion of national superiority over others.

Militarism:An emphasis on military power and using violence to implement policies or extend influence.

Suppression of Opposition: The active repression of political dissent through censorship, propaganda, and control over mass media.

Propaganda: The pervasive dissemination of propaganda aimed at shaping public opinion and reinforcing the regime's ideological framework.

Cult of Personality:
The leader's elevation to a near-divine status through various means, including propaganda, public rallies, and iconography.

Scapegoating: The attribution of societal challenges to specific groups (whether ethnic, religious, or political), which frequently results in their persecution.

Anti-Democratic Sentiments: A dismissal of democratic institutions and principles perceived as inherently weak or ineffective.

Economic Control: While complete state ownership is not always present, the regime often enforces substantial regulation favouring corporations that align with its interests.

Anti-Intellectualism: A scepticism towards intellectuals and academic institutions, promoting traditionalist values while critiquing modernist ideologies.

Characteristics of a Fascist Leader:

Charismatic Authority:The leader is perceived as a messianic figure, often positioning themselves as transcendent to legal and political norms.

Manipulative Communication: A proficient orator employing emotionally charged rhetoric to resonate with public anxieties and sentiments.

Intolerance: An overtly hostile attitude towards dissenters, minorities, and foreign influences.

Populism: A stance that claims to embody the interests of the general populace while attributing societal problems to elites or outsiders.

Militant nationalism:is characterised by a pursuit of national revitalisation or a resurgence to a prior state of prominence, frequently pursued through militaristic approaches."


Donald Trump has demonstrated specific authoritarian and nationalist characteristics that bear resemblance to those of fascist leaders; however, the question of whether he can be classified definitively as a fascist remains contentious among historians and political analysts. To analyse this issue, we can examine key elements associated with fascism:

Similarities to Fascism

1. Strongman Leadership & Cult of Personality – Trump positions himself as capable of "fixing" America and frequently frames his adversaries as threats to the state. His campaign rallies, branding strategies, and demands for personal loyalty reflect aspects of fascist-style leadership.

2. Nationalism & Scapegoating– His "America First" narrative corresponds with nationalist ideologies, and he often attributes societal issues to immigrants, minority groups, and the media.

3. Propaganda & Media Attacks – Trump routinely assails the media, labelling it as "fake news" and "the enemy of the people," a strategy analogous to those employed by fascist regimes to undermine independent journalism.

4. Populism & Anti-Elite Sentiment – He presents himself as an outsider combating corrupt elites, an everyday populist appeal found in fascist movements, despite his substantial wealth and political influence.

5. Undermining Democracy– His efforts to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election, incite political violence (as evidenced by the events of January 6), and disregard democratic norms reflect authoritarian methodologies.

Differences from Full Fascism

1. No Complete State Control – In contrast to historical fascist regimes that completely dismantle democratic institutions, Trump did not entirely undermine these frameworks, with the U.S. system of checks and balances constraining his authority.

2. Lack of Militarization* – Although he admired military prowess, he did not establish paramilitary forces or seek overarching military dominance.

3. No Fully Centralized Economy – Trump maintained adherence to capitalist policies and did not advocate for state-controlled economic systems typical of historical fascist regimes.

Conclusion

While Trump displays authoritarian and nationalist traits that coincide with certain fascist tendencies, he does not entirely conform to the established historical definitions of fascist leaders such as Mussolini or Hitler. Some scholars have characterised his approach as "authoritarian populism" or "proto-fascism."

Wednesday, February 5, 2025

Korybko To Sputnik Brasil: USAID Is A Premier Weapon Of US Hybrid Warfare In The HemisphereAndrew Korybko Feb 6,2025


1. How has USAID been used by the government of the United States through the years to meddle in other countries, mainly Brazil and other countries from Latin America?

USAID is infamous for funding political programs under the cover of human rights and democracy to meddle in the recipient country’s domestic affairs. This popularly takes the form of funding movements, including media projects, to expose alleged corruption in Latin American states. The purpose is to artificially generate a groundswell of grassroots opposition to incumbent governments through street protests and/or surprise election showings to bring about political change.

Some locals collaborating with these foreign-funded political projects sometimes become advisors or even figures in the more pro-American governments that replace the targeted ones. Therefore, USAID doesn’t just work to remove Latin American governments, it also sometimes provides trained advisors and personnel for the next governments. This makes it a premier weapon of US Hybrid Warfare in the hemisphere.

2. Does the end of USAID mean the end of US interference in other countries’ domestic affairs? Will they change their method instead?

New Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that he’s the acting administrator of USAID as it goes through radical reforms. Per Trump’s Executive Order suspending foreign aid for 90 days, with the exception of emergency humanitarian aid, an assessment is taking place to determine their efficiency and consistency with policy. Accordingly, many programs dealing with socio-cultural issues like LGBT will likely be cut, while foreign media funding and the training of foreign political cadres will likely continue.

3. How do you evaluate Trump’s decision to end USAID?

USAID made sense from the perspective of older American interests when it was first founded. Still, it was hijacked by liberal-globalist ideologues to proselytise radical socio-cultural policies that don’t objectively align with the US national interests. Examples of the most ridiculous programs are being shared across X. Many Americans are enraged to discover what they were funding and surprised that a lot of the money also went to domestic “NGOs” for implementing these projects.

Ending USAID was necessary since that’s the only way to implement the radical reforms that the Trump Administration envisages, which are most immediately reducing government expenditures via the Elon Musk-led “Department Of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) and then realigning those that remain with policy. Many employees are also diehard ideological opponents of Trump and all that he represents, so keeping them around runs the risk that they’d try to sabotage his second term like they did his first one.

What’s essentially happening is that Trump 2.0 entered power with a detailed plan for purging hostile elements of the US “deep state”, which refers in this context to its permanent military, intelligence, and diplomatic bureaucracies, with some also including its administrative and others. USAID was a significant component of the US power structure for decades before Trump’s second term, so dismantling it is considered crucial for the success of his team’s foreign policy.

4. Some US politicians have criticised the Trump Administration’s reforms of federal agencies, fearing that confidential information might leak out and even describing the overall gist of what’s going on as a “serious threat to national security”. What do they fear? Like Musk mentioned, is this a sign of USAID’s connection with the CIA?

Not every USAID employee and project is connected to the CIA. Still, the CIA does indeed sometimes employ the aforesaid in advance of its goals due to the relative ease with which their democracy and human rights covers enable US spies to infiltrate and/or destabilise foreign countries. Those criticising Trump’s reforms are elements of the US power structure who stand to lose from his and Musk’s campaign to expose irresponsible government spending and political meddling abroad.

Some of them do have a point, namely that innocent USAID employees might be suspected of being spies, and this could lead to credible threats against them. Still, the Trump Administration is willing to risk those consequences to pursue its ambitious reform campaign. Purging USAID, the State Department, and the “deep state” more broadly is the only way to prevent them from sabotaging Trump’s foreign policy the second time around, which he envisages revolutionising the US relations with the world.

Excerpts from this interview were published in Sputnik Brasil’s report titled “'Arma principal da guerra híbrida': o que muda na política externa dos EUA com o fim da USAID?”

Upgrade to paid

You're currently a free subscriber to Andrew Korybko's Newsletter. For the whole experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

 
Like
Comment
Restack
 
© 2025 Andrew Korybko
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
Unsubscribe

Start writing


Monday, February 3, 2025

What Trump’s Trade War Would Mean, in Nine Charts


What Trump’s Trade War Would Mean, in Nine Charts
President Trump’s tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico could upend U.S. trade. These nine charts show what’s at stake, what comes next, and why it matters.

Article by Shannon K. O'Neil and Julia Huesa

Last updated February 1, 2025 6:38 pm (EST)

    
On February 1, President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico—the United States’ largest trading partners. U.S. importers will pay a 25 per cent tax on all goods from Canada and Mexico as Trump tries to force both countries to curb migration and drug trafficking into the United States. Imports from China, meanwhile, will face 10 per cent tariffs—punishment for Beijing’s failure to rein in the smuggling of fentanyl precursor chemicals to Canada and Mexico, where they are made into U.S.-bound fentanyl.

Here are nine graphics that show the potential economic effects of such tariffs on all four countries.

How could tariffs affect the United States?
Nearly half of all U.S. imports—more than $1.3 trillion—come from Canada, China, and Mexico. However, analysis by Bloomberg Economics shows that the new tariffs could reduce overall U.S. imports by 15 per cent. While the Washington, DC-based Tax Foundation estimates that the tariffs will generate around $100 billion per year in extra federal tax revenue, they could also impose significant costs on the broader economy: disrupting supply chains, raising costs for businesses, eliminating hundreds of thousands of jobs, and ultimately driving up consumer prices.


Specific sectors of the U.S. economy will be hit particularly hard, including the automotive, energy, and food sectors. Gas prices could surge as much as 50 cents per gallon in the Midwest, as Canada and Mexico supply more than 70 per cent [PDF] of crude oil imports to U.S. refineries. Also at risk are cars and other vehicles, as the United States imports nearly half its auto parts from its northern and southern neighbours. 

A 25 per cent tariff on Canada and Mexico will raise production costs for U.S. automakers, adding up to $3,000 to the price of some of the roughly sixteen million cars sold annually. Grocery costs could rise, too, as Mexico is the United States’ most significant source of fresh produce, supplying more than 60 per cent of U.S. vegetable imports and nearly half of all fruit and nut imports.

More From Our Experts
James M. Lindsay
The Costs of Trump’s Foreign Policy Disruption
Michael Froman
DeepSeek: Making Sense of the Reaction—and Overreaction
Joshua Kurlantzick
Bangladesh Could Turn to China as Trump Pulls Aid From the Country

Still, the United States relies less on trade than many other industrialised economies, including Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Imports and exports make up just a quarter of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), and the United States sources what it does import from a relatively broad set of nations.
How could tariffs affect Canada and Mexico?

Tariffs will hit Canada and Mexico much harder, as trade makes up about 70% of both economies’ GDP. 

Canada and Mexico Are Far More Dependent on the U.S. Than Vice Versa
Trade in goods, 2023

Source: UN Comtrade.
The two countries are mainly dependent on trade with the United States. More than 80 per cent of Mexico’s exports—including cars, machinery, fruits, vegetables, and medical equipment—head north, accounting for 15 per cent of total U.S. imports. This dependence is especially pronounced on Mexico’s northern border. There, industrial states Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León, and Baja California account for nearly half of Mexico’s exports to the United States, sending more than $200 billion worth of computers, electronics, transportation equipment, and other products each year.

According to Bloomberg Economics, a unilateral 25 per cent tariff on these goods could slash Mexico’s GDP by some 16 per cent, with Mexico’s auto industry bearing the brunt. Mexico sends nearly 80 per cent of the cars it produces to the United States alone, amounting to some 2.5 million vehicles annually. Duties will also threaten Mexico’s energy sector; the United States receives roughly 60 per cent of Mexico’s petroleum exports, most of which is crude oil bound for U.S. refineries. At the same time, Mexico is the top destination for U.S. refined oil exports, which meet over 70 per cent of domestic demand. U.S. tariffs will likely make fuel more expensive, raising prices at the pump and straining Mexico’s broader economy.

Canada faces a similar challenge. The United States buys more than 70 per cent [PDF; in Spanish] of Canada’s exports, with these goods making up 14 per cent of total U.S. imports. Under the new tariffs, Canada’s energy sector will take the biggest hit, as exporters send 80 per cent of their oil south. 

These asymmetries in the cost of tariffs at home give the U.S. significant leverage over its North American partners in negotiations.

How could tariffs affect China?
China is comparatively less dependent on the United States and less reliant on trade overall. Over the past two decades, the country has steadily reduced the importance of trade to its economy as Beijing has ramped up domestic production. Today, imports and exports account for only about 37 per cent of China’s GDP, compared to more than 60 per cent in the early 2000s. 
China Is Not as Reliant on U.S. Trade
Trade in goods, 2023
Source: UN Comtrade.
In recent years, U.S.-China trade has declined, particularly in sectors hit by previous tariffs and export controls, such as auto parts, data servers, furniture, and semiconductors. China has instead ramped up trade with other partners including the European Union, Mexico, and Vietnam. The country’s share of global trade had climbed roughly 4 per cent since 2016, when President Trump first took office, even as the United States share has dipped. Combined, these factors will lessen the shock of an additional 10 per cent tariff on Chinese exports to the United States.

Get the Background
The Contentious U.S.-China Trade Relationship
What could happen the day after?
Each country’s currency could weaken further, lessening the bite of import tariffs and raising the effective price of U.S. exports to other nations. A weakened yuan has already softened the blow for Chinese producers, helping their exports remain competitive worldwide. The roughly 30 per cent depreciation of Mexico’s peso since April and the Canadian dollar’s 8 per cent drop since September also lessen the potential impact. Markets could potentially drive the peso and the Canadian dollar further down, not that tariffs are in place.

Additionally, Canada, China, or Mexico could respond in kind, imposing tit-for-tat tariffs on the United States. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has already suggested that Mexico could retaliate with its own tariffs, and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which underpins North American free trade, would likely allow it.

This wouldn’t be the first time countries have reciprocated. In 2018, Mexico and Canada placed retaliatory tariffs on more than $15 billion worth of U.S. goods—including steel, pork, yoghurt, and tablecloths—after Trump imposed tariffs on their steel and aluminium. Likewise, the United States lost $20 billion in annual farm exports when China hit back against several U.S. tariffs from 2018 to 2019.


If either Canada or Mexico retaliates, U.S. fuel exporters would likely take the biggest hit alongside automakers and other advanced manufacturers, including pharmaceutical producers.

Some States Are More Dependent on Canada, Mexico, and China
U.S. exports by destination country, 2023

Source: U.S. Census Bureau.
Retaliatory tariffs on the United States would predominantly affect manufacturing-heavy states. Mexico buys 70 per cent [PDF] of New Mexico’s exports, including billions of dollars in U.S. semiconductor chips and electrical components that return to the United States in Mexican-made cars and appliances. Texas sends more than $20 billion in chips, auto parts, and electrical equipment to Mexico; overall, its southbound exports account for 5% of its GDP. Tariffs would also dent Ohio’s $5 billion worth of auto and metal exports to Canada and Maine’s $320 million in northbound lumber and paper exports.