Distinguished Guest
Ladies
and gentlemen.
Good Morning. I am delighted to
be here, on behalf of the The House of Federation and myself, let me welcome
you all to these Retreat on
Constitutional Interpretation in Beshoftu.
Let me acknowledge and thank
Justice Albie Sachs, Prof Ulrich Karpen and Dr Xavier Arbos, for being with us in
this retreat. I feel deeply privileged by their presence to share us their rich
experience in the subject matter.
The House of Federation is
Ethiopia’s Second Chamber of the federal Parliament, representing Ethiopia’s 75
ethnic groups, the Nations, Nationalities and Peoples of Ethiopia. While the
ethnic, cultural and religious diversity of our country has been suppressed
during previous regimes, the Nations, Nationalities and Peoples became the
founders of the new, federal and democratic Ethiopia in 1994. The Ethiopian
Constitution is based on the principle of self-determination and focuses
strongly both on group as well as individual rights.
The constitution strongly
promotes equality, democracy and social justice and binds governments to the
development of the country. The Nations, Nationalities and Peoples are granted
an unconditional right to self-determination up to secession. For this reason,
the Second Chamber of Parliament, the House of Federation is representing the
Nations, Nationalities and Peoples and not the regional states.
While many second chambers have
strong legislative mandates, the House of Federation’s mandates is different.
The House of Federation resolves conflicts between regional states and between
regional governments and the federal government, it designs and decides the
larger part of the fiscal transfer system, it promotes the unity of the country
through equitable development and last but not least, it interprets the
constitution and promotes democracy and constitutionalism.
The federal system of Ethiopia
has helped much in reducing armed conflicts and has been instrumental in
helping the nation to inspire for bright future coexistence with tangible economic
developments. However the Ethiopian
federal model has not been without weaknesses and criticisms.
The Framers of Ethiopian
constitution laid down the most important framework where by the politician,
professional and legitimacy of sovereign power join and work together in
constitutional interpretation. It is unique and we can call Ethiopian Model of
Constitutional interpretation. Unlike other countries we opted in giving this
mandate to The House of federation and CCI members as an advisory body to the
House in interpreting the constitution.
Constitutional interpretation
is one of the pillars of our constitution. Without strength in this pillar, the
constitutional system could face a risk of serious damage or crisis. The
quality, efficiency and transparency with which we deal with constitutional
interpretation are core criteria by which the House of Federation and the
Council of Constitutional Inquiry can be judged for meeting its obligations to
our people.
So far as a young Democratic institution both
the House of federation and CCI has many limitations in terms of institutional
capacity, mainly lack of skilled and professional experts, lack of system in
case handling and also lack of awareness on the issues of constitutional
interpretation among varies segments of the society.
Retreat like this one may help
us to exchange experiences of other countries to deal with the challenges we
have regarding institutional capacity. Although one size does not fit all,
learning from others and adapting in to our own context should be principle. When
we invite guests to share their experience.
Let us recall that this is
actually the second meeting of this kind of basically the same group of
experts, judges, parliamentarians and officials that have leadership roles in
constitutional interpretation in our young democracy. We had been also met in Adama in May 2011.
At that meeting – the first of
its kind on this important subject – as a group we identified both the major
strengths and some important weaknesses in our performance in the previous 15
years. There were also very animated discussions about some areas that needed
improvements. The question is: How
do we make real progress?
The
House of Federation has embarked on immense and intense activities promoting constitutionalism
and democracy throughout the last six years. Huge efforts have been undertaken
in popularizing the democratic principles of the constitution. Among many
others we have designed radio and TV programs which are both entertaining and
educational. Most of them are quiz-shows, participating the audience. We have
designed a series of animated cartoons for children, explaining democratic
principles through short stories around the life of school-children. This
includes equal rights of men and women, children’s rights, fair elections and
the like. The resonance from children and adults towards this program but also
to other is immense.
The more we increase awareness
creation, the more demand will be created among the society in bringing their
case to the House of Federation and to the CCI. Therefore we are required to
make and create capable institution which works effectively and efficiently.
Conclusion
Let me conclude by saying, this
is a very good opportunity for CCI Members and Participants from the Region to
exchange views and rich professional experience of our distinguished guests
from three countries. Based on this we will
need to act swiftly to put in place the system which is adoptable to Ethiopian
scenario.
Finally, I would like to thank the organizers
for the Preparation of this very valuable retreat which is designed to discuss
on the most important issue and Center of gravity in our constitutional system.
Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment