The emergence of a collaborative initiative against Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed's administration marks a significant shift in Ethiopia's complex political landscape. This type of alliance—whether tactical (short-term, goal-specific) or strategic (long-term, vision-driven)—requires unified action and clear articulation of its purpose, structure, and guiding principles. In a multi-national, ideologically divided, and structurally contested country like Ethiopia, any political movement that seeks to challenge the sitting regime must overcome deeply entrenched historical, ethnic, and ideological rifts to achieve legitimacy and sustainability.
Ethiopia's Multi-National Reality and Structural Tensions
Ethiopia is not a monolithic state; it is a multi-national federation (at least constitutionally), where diverse nations, nationalities, and peoples coexist, each with distinct historical narratives, grievances, and aspirations. The federalist camp, primarily dominated by ethno-nationalist movements, views self-rule and regional autonomy as non-negotiable rights. Conversely, the unitary camp advocates for a centralised system prioritising national unity and territorial integrity over ethnic federalism. This fundamental disagreement has produced irreconcilable positions manifesting in political contestations, armed conflicts, and policy paralysis.
A vague or opaque coalition against the Abiy administration will not hold in this environment. Without a clearly communicated vision, objectives, and governance model, such an initiative risks being dismissed as another opportunistic power grab by dissatisfied elites rather than a credible, inclusive alternative.
The Necessity of Publicising the Collaboration Model
For this anti-Abiy collaboration to gain credibility, trust, and broad-based support, its leaders must publicly define:
The Desired Outcome: Is the goal to remove Abiy Ahmed only, or to dismantle the existing political order entirely? Will the coalition advocate for a transitional government, or is there a long-term political blueprint?
The Collaboration Framework: Who are the stakeholders? What power-sharing mechanisms will be in place? How will marginalised groups be included?
The Operational Mechanisms: What is the decision-making process? What are the methods for conflict resolution within the coalition? How will accountability and transparency be ensured?
Building Stakeholder Buy-In
Stakeholder buy-in is non-negotiable in Ethiopia's fractured political arena. Different groups—whether political parties, liberation fronts, civic organisations, religious institutions, or international partners—must see their interests and security concerns reflected in the collaboration’s design. Otherwise, they will either remain neutral or actively oppose the initiative, potentially leading to its premature collapse.
Transparency about goals, structures, and timelines is essential to mobilise public support and neutralise regime propaganda that may portray the alliance as an illegitimate, divisive force.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of Previous Alliances
Ethiopia’s modern political history is filled with failed alliances built on the temporary convergence of interests without foundational trust or a shared vision. The fall of the Derg, the rise and fall of the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), and the fragmentation of opposition groups in recent years all offer sobering lessons. Without:
Shared accountability mechanisms
Clear conflict management strategies
An inclusive national vision
No matter how promising, any alliance will ultimately disintegrate under the weight of internal contradictions.
Conclusion:
The Path to Legitimate and Effective Collaboration
In conclusion, a successful anti-Abiy collaboration in Ethiopia cannot afford to be shrouded in secrecy or dominated by elite bargaining. It must be transparent, inclusive, and publicly accountable. The ideological divides, federal-unitary tensions, and multi-national sensitivities demand a level of openness and participatory design that moves beyond backroom deals and militaristic calculations.
To secure genuine buy-in from Ethiopia’s diverse stakeholders, the coalition must present a clear roadmap that answers critical questions about Ethiopia’s political future, not just about the fall of the current administration. Without this, the initiative risks another failed chapter in Ethiopia’s long struggle for democratic transformation and durable peace.
No comments:
Post a Comment