Exploring the Difference Between Liberalism and Neoliberalism.

 Exploring the Difference Between Liberalism and Neoliberalism

Introduction:

Liberalism and neoliberalism are two distinct ideologies that have shaped political and economic thought over the years. While they share some similarities, they also have fundamental differences. This essay aims to provide an overview of the key distinctions between liberalism and neoliberalism, highlighting their respective origins, principles, and policy implications.

Origins:

Liberalism emerged during the Enlightenment period in the 17th and 18th centuries as a response to authoritarian rule. It emphasized individual freedom, limited government intervention, and the protection of civil liberties and human rights. Liberal thinkers such as John Locke and Adam Smith laid the foundation for classical liberal thought, advocating for a free market economy and individual autonomy.

Neoliberalism, on the other hand, emerged in the late 20th century as a response to perceived shortcomings of classical liberalism. It sought to revitalize liberal ideas by incorporating elements of economic liberalism and market-oriented policies. Influential neoliberal thinkers include Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, who argued for reducing government regulations and promoting free trade and globalization.

Principles:

Liberalism places a strong emphasis on individual rights and liberties, equality under the law, and the protection of private property. It supports representative democracy, a social contract between citizens and the state, and the separation of powers. Liberals typically advocate for a mixed economy, where government intervention is limited to ensuring market competition, maintaining social safety nets, and providing public goods and services.

Neoliberalism builds upon these principles but places a greater emphasis on economic liberalism and free markets. Neoliberals argue that market forces are the most efficient mechanism for allocating resources and generating prosperity. They advocate for deregulation, privatization, and reducing barriers to trade and investment. Neoliberal policies also emphasize fiscal discipline, emphasizing the importance of balanced budgets and austerity measures.

Role of Government:

Liberalism recognizes the need for a limited role of government to safeguard individual rights and ensure social stability. Liberals generally support public intervention in areas such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure to promote equal opportunities and social welfare. They also advocate for progressive taxation to address economic inequalities.

Neoliberalism, in contrast, promotes a more minimalistic role for the state. Neoliberals argue that excessive government intervention stifles economic growth and individual freedom. They advocate for reducing government regulations and bureaucracy, promoting free trade, and encouraging private sector involvement in public services. Neoliberals often advocate for supply-side economics, emphasizing tax cuts and deregulation as means to stimulate economic growth.

Policy Implications:

Liberal policies often focus on social justice, income redistribution, and the provision of public services. They support progressive taxation, welfare programs, and regulations to protect workers' rights and the environment. Liberals prioritize social equality and view government intervention as necessary to address market failures and promote a fairer society.

Neoliberal policies prioritize economic efficiency, market competition, and private sector-led growth. They advocate for free trade agreements, privatization of state-owned enterprises, and reducing government deficits through austerity measures. Neoliberals argue that a market-oriented approach stimulates economic development and creates opportunities for individuals, ultimately benefiting society as a whole.

The key principles of liberalism can vary depending on the specific context and historical period. However, there are several fundamental principles that are commonly associated with liberalism. These principles include:

1. Individual Freedom and Autonomy: Liberalism places a central emphasis on individual freedom and autonomy. It upholds the rights of individuals to make choices and pursue their own interests, as long as they do not harm others. Liberals believe that individuals should have the freedom to express themselves, engage in peaceful assembly, and participate in the political process.

2. Limited Government: Liberalism advocates for a limited role of government in people's lives. Liberals argue that government power should be constrained and balanced to prevent abuses and protect individual rights. They support the rule of law, constitutionalism, and the separation of powers to ensure that government actions are accountable and transparent.

3. Protection of Civil Liberties and Human Rights: Liberals emphasize the protection of civil liberties and human rights as a core principle. They advocate for equal rights and opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their race, gender, religion, or other characteristics. Civil liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press are considered fundamental rights that should be protected by the government.

4. Rule of Law and Equality under the Law: Liberalism promotes the rule of law and equality under the law. It asserts that all individuals should be treated equally before the law, regardless of their social status or political influence. Liberals argue that the legal system should be impartial, just, and independent from political interference.

5. Social Contract and Consent of the Governed: Liberalism often incorporates the concept of a social contract between citizens and the state. According to this idea, individuals give their consent to be governed in exchange for protection of their rights and welfare. Liberals emphasize the importance of representative democracy, where government officials are elected by the people and accountable to them.

6. Free Market Economy: Liberalism traditionally supports a free market economy, where individuals have the freedom to engage in voluntary economic transactions. It promotes private property rights, competition, and market mechanisms as the most efficient way to allocate resources and generate prosperity. However, it also recognizes the need for government intervention to address market failures and ensure social welfare.

7. Tolerance and Pluralism: Liberals value tolerance and pluralism, recognizing that societies are diverse and composed of individuals with different beliefs, values, and identities. They advocate for the acceptance of diverse viewpoints, peaceful coexistence, and protection of minority rights. Liberals argue that a tolerant society is more inclusive, dynamic, and conducive to social progress.

It's important to note that liberalism is a broad and evolving ideology, and different strands of liberalism may place varying degrees of emphasis on these principles. Additionally, interpretations and applications of liberalism can differ across different countries and historical periods.

There are numerous examples of liberal democracies around the world. Here are some prominent examples:

1. United States: The United States is often considered a leading liberal democracy. It has a constitutional framework that enshrines principles such as individual rights, separation of powers, and representative democracy. The U.S. political system includes regular free and fair elections, multiple political parties, and a strong emphasis on civil liberties and the rule of law.

2. United Kingdom: The United Kingdom operates as a parliamentary democracy with a constitutional monarchy. It has a long-standing tradition of liberal democracy, with a system that includes free and fair elections, respect for civil liberties, and an independent judiciary. The UK is known for its parliamentary sovereignty and adherence to the rule of law.

3. Canada: Canada is a federal parliamentary democracy that upholds liberal democratic principles. It has a multi-party system, regular elections, and a strong commitment to protecting civil liberties and human rights. Canada's constitution guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms, and the country has a reputation for inclusiveness and multiculturalism.

4. Germany: Germany operates as a federal parliamentary republic and is recognized as a liberal democracy. It has a multiparty system, regular elections, and a strong commitment to the rule of law and human rights. Germany's political system places a significant emphasis on protecting individual freedoms and fostering social welfare.

5. Australia: Australia is a federal parliamentary democracy that practices liberal democracy. It has a robust political system characterized by free and fair elections, protection of civil liberties, and an independent judiciary. Australia also has a strong tradition of democratic values and multiculturalism.

6. France: France operates as a unitary semi-presidential republic and is considered a liberal democracy. It has a multi-party system, regular elections, and a commitment to protecting civil liberties and human rights. France has a long history of democratic principles and has been influential in the development of liberal thought.

7. Japan: Japan is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy with a liberal democratic system. It has multiple political parties, regular elections, and a strong commitment to civil liberties and the rule of law. Japan's political system is known for its stability and democratic governance.

These are just a few examples of liberal democracies, and there are many other countries around the world that also adhere to liberal democratic principles to varying degrees. It's important to note that the extent to which these countries adhere to liberal democratic values can vary, and there may be ongoing debates and challenges related to the implementation and protection of these principles in practice.

Liberal democracy is a form of government that combines liberal principles with democratic governance. It is characterized by a commitment to protecting individual rights and freedoms while upholding democratic processes and institutions. The key principles of liberal democracy include:

1. Rule of Law: Liberal democracy emphasizes the rule of law, which means that all individuals, including government officials, are subject to and accountable to the law. It ensures that laws are enacted and enforced fairly and impartially, guaranteeing equal treatment and protection of individual rights.

2. Protection of Individual Rights and Liberties: Liberal democracy places a strong emphasis on protecting individual rights and liberties. These rights include freedom of expression, assembly, and association, as well as the protection of civil liberties such as freedom of religion, privacy, and equality before the law. Liberal democracies aim to safeguard these rights and ensure that they are respected and upheld by the government and other individuals.

3. Popular Sovereignty: Liberal democracy is based on the principle of popular sovereignty, which means that political power rests with the people. It emphasizes that political decisions should be made through free and fair elections, where citizens have the right to vote and participate in the political process. Liberal democracies typically have representative systems of government, where elected officials act on behalf of the people.

4. Pluralism and Tolerance: Liberal democracies value pluralism and tolerance, recognizing and respecting the diversity of opinions, beliefs, and identities within society. They promote an inclusive and open society that allows for the peaceful coexistence of different groups, fostering dialogue and understanding. Liberal democracies prioritize protecting minority rights and preventing discrimination based on race, gender, religion, or other characteristics.

5. Separation of Powers: Liberal democracies often employ a system of checks and balances through the separation of powers. This principle ensures that the powers of government are divided among different branches, typically the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The separation of powers creates a system of accountability and prevents the concentration of power in any one branch.

6. Free and Fair Elections: Liberal democracies rely on free and fair elections as a means for citizens to choose their representatives and hold them accountable. These elections are conducted with transparency, allowing for open competition among political parties and candidates. Liberal democracies also ensure that all citizens have equal access to participate in the electoral process.

7. Independent Judiciary: Liberal democracies maintain an independent judiciary to interpret and apply the law impartially. An independent judiciary acts as a check on the government's power, ensuring that laws are consistent with constitutional principles and protecting individual rights. It provides a mechanism for resolving disputes and upholding the rule of law.

These principles form the foundation of liberal democracy, promoting a system that combines the protection of individual rights and freedoms with democratic governance and citizen participation. It's important to note that the application and interpretation of these principles can vary across different liberal democracies, influenced by historical, cultural, and political contexts.

Liberal democracy differs from other forms of government in several key aspects. Here are some notable differences between liberal democracy and other systems:

1. Authoritarianism: Liberal democracy stands in contrast to authoritarian forms of government. In authoritarian systems, power is concentrated in the hands of a single ruler, a small group, or a single political party. These systems often lack mechanisms for citizen participation, free and fair elections, and protection of individual rights. Decision-making is typically top-down, and dissent or opposition is often suppressed.

2. Totalitarianism: Totalitarianism represents an extreme form of authoritarianism where the government exercises complete control over all aspects of public and private life. Totalitarian regimes seek to shape and control all aspects of society, including the economy, culture, education, and even personal beliefs. Individual freedoms and civil liberties are severely curtailed, and opposition or dissent is typically met with harsh repression.

3. Monarchy: Monarchy is a form of government where power is inherited through a royal family. While some constitutional monarchies exist within a liberal democratic framework, where the monarch's powers are limited and there are democratic institutions, absolute or hereditary monarchies grant significant power to the monarch without democratic checks and balances.

4. Dictatorship: Dictatorship is a form of government where power is held by a single individual, often obtained and maintained through force or coercion. Dictators exercise unchecked authority and typically suppress political opposition and dissent. Dictatorships lack the principles of popular sovereignty and the protection of individual rights inherent in liberal democracies.

5. Theocracy: Theocracy is a system where religious leaders or institutions hold political power and govern based on religious principles. In theocracies, religious law often takes precedence over secular law, and political decisions are influenced by religious doctrines. Theocratic systems may limit individual freedoms and civil liberties based on religious interpretations, which can differ significantly from the principles of liberal democracy.

6. One-Party States: One-party states are characterized by a political system dominated by a single political party. These systems can exist within different ideologies, such as socialism or communism. While some one-party states claim to uphold democratic principles, the absence of competing parties and limited political pluralism often restricts meaningful political competition and citizen participation.

7. Oligarchy: Oligarchy refers to a system where power is concentrated in the hands of a small, privileged elite. Oligarchies can exist in various forms, such as economic elites or influential families controlling political power. These systems often lack broad-based citizen participation, and decision-making is influenced by the interests of the ruling elite.

In contrast to these forms of government, liberal democracy promotes principles such as the rule of law, protection of individual rights and freedoms, popular sovereignty, pluralism, separation of powers, and free and fair elections. Liberal democracies aim to balance individual freedoms with the collective will of the people, providing mechanisms for citizen participation and checks on government power.

There are several examples of countries that are commonly characterized as having authoritarian governments. Here are a few notable examples:

1. China: The People's Republic of China is often considered an authoritarian regime, led by the Chinese Communist Party. The party exercises significant control over political, social, and economic aspects of the country. China has strict censorship and limited political freedoms, with the government tightly controlling the media, internet access, and civil society organizations.

2. North Korea: North Korea, officially known as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is widely regarded as one of the most authoritarian states in the world. The country is ruled by the Kim dynasty, with supreme power held by the leader. North Korea has a highly centralized government, limited political freedoms, severe restrictions on media and information, and a pervasive cult of personality surrounding the ruling family.

3. Russia: Russia has been characterized as having an increasingly authoritarian regime under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin. The government has faced criticism for limitations on political opposition, curtailment of media freedoms, and allegations of human rights abuses. There are concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of a few and the suppression of dissenting voices.

4. Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy where power is concentrated in the hands of the ruling Al Saud family. The country has limited political freedoms, strict control over the media, and a legal system based on Islamic law. Political dissent is met with severe consequences, and human rights organizations have raised concerns about the treatment of activists and religious minorities.

5. Belarus: Belarus is often cited as an authoritarian state led by President Alexander Lukashenko, who has been in power since 1994. The government has faced criticism for suppressing opposition, restricting freedom of the press, and conducting fraudulent elections. Recent protests and crackdowns on dissent have drawn international attention to the authoritarian nature of the regime.

6. Cuba: Cuba has been governed by the Communist Party since the Cuban Revolution in 1959. The government has maintained tight control over political power, limited political pluralism, and suppressed dissenting voices. Freedom of expression and assembly are restricted, and the media is heavily regulated by the state.

7. Venezuela: Venezuela has faced accusations of moving towards an authoritarian regime under President Nicolás Maduro. The government has been criticized for cracking down on political opposition, limiting freedom of the press, and undermining democratic institutions. There have been concerns raised about human rights abuses and the erosion of democratic norms.

It's important to note that categorizing a government as authoritarian is a complex matter, and the extent and nature of authoritarianism can vary within each country. Additionally, political dynamics and assessments can change over time, and different sources may provide varying perspectives on the classification of a particular government.

Conclusion:

In summary, while liberalism and neoliberalism share some common roots, they differ significantly in their emphasis on economic liberalism, the role of government, and policy priorities. Liberals prioritize individual rights, social justice, and a mixed economy with limited government intervention. Neoliberals place a stronger emphasis on

US, China Lay Out Vision for New World Order Amid Human Rights Differences

US, China Lay Out Vision for New World Order Amid Human Rights Differences

September 15, 2023 0:15 AM

Akmal Dawi

FILE - The American and Chinese flags wave at Genting Snow Park, Feb. 2, 2022, in Zhangjiakou, China.

As global leaders converge in New York for the 78th U.N. General Assembly this month, the United States and China, already embroiled in a fierce contest for expanded global influence, have unveiled distinctive visions for the next era of international order.

“One era is ending, a new one is beginning,” said U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken as he outlined the Biden administration's ambitious blueprint for the future on Wednesday.

Blinken said the United States is building up alliances to strengthen democracies, promote human rights and enhance economic development.

Lambasting China for supporting autocratic regimes worldwide and Russia for launching an unjust war against Ukraine, Blinken declared the United States' commitment to nurturing alliances that bolster democracies, champion human rights and foster economic development.

"We will advance this vision guided by a sense of enlightened self-interest that has long animated U.S. leadership at its best," he said.

Meanwhile this week, Beijing unveiled its Proposal of the People's Republic of China on the Reform and Development of Global Governance.

“Humanity is once again at a crossroads,” said the 5,400-word Chinese proposal, which calls for greater multilateralism in international affairs with a reformed United Nations and an expanded Security Council at its core.

“Together, we will create a better future for humanity,” the proposal concluded.

Persistent doubts

The United States and China both express the desire for a global governance system with increased participation from developing countries. Both agree on the need to expand the U.N. Security Council. But the expansion has remained a topic of heated debate without concrete action from either side.

Also, doubts loom over the true intentions of the two superpowers.

What both sides say is not what they really want,” said Hossein Askari, a professor of politics at George Washington University in the U.S. capital.

Beneath the veneer of multilateralism, the major powers may seek to safeguard and expand their own interests, Askari told VOA

“So, China, Russia say that they want a new multipolar world with no dominant power. But that is their sweet talk. They espouse new power for the [Global] South in order to get their support in the struggle with the U.S.,” said Askari.

“The U.S., on the other hand, wants to stay at the top of the unipolar world. The U.S. needs new alliances around the world to challenge a rising China,” he noted.

Building a truly multipolar world would necessitate the superpowers willingly ceding or sharing their unequal influence on the international stage to empower the majority of less powerful countries.

“This is not necessarily a ‘win’ for the vast number of developing states,” said Jeffrey Taliaferro, professor of political science at Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts.

“While Global South states may obtain a bit more ‘voice’ in forums like the BRICS, the G20 and other venues, the two superpowers will still call the shots,” Taliaferro told VOA.

The United States and its Western allies — historically the architects of post-World War II and post-Cold War global institutions — have formed formidable alliances to protect and advance their common interests.

Simultaneously, China, despite criticism of its one-party political system, has been gaining traction in global public opinion as a burgeoning world power.

A recent survey conducted by the George Marshall Fund, or GMF, indicates that younger generations in the United States, Canada, Turkey and Europe are more inclined to predict a shift toward multipolarity, with China replacing the United States as the world's most influential actor, and the European Union emerging as a more influential third player.

Human rights

One of the central points of divergence between the United States and China is their stance on universal human rights.

U.S. officials emphasize the importance of promoting and protecting human rights, including those of women and minorities, as a core element of their foreign policy.

Blinken envisioned this as "a world where international law and the core principles of the U.N. Charter are upheld, and where universal human rights are respected."

China, on the other hand, has said there is not a one-size-fits-all approach to promoting and protecting human rights because of varying historical backgrounds, cultural heritages, social systems and levels of socioeconomic development among nations.

Accusations of human rights abuses by China, such as the alleged genocide of Uyghur Muslims and restrictions on freedom of speech, have led the U.S. to argue that crimes against humanity should not be treated solely as internal matters of a state.

The U.S. aims to protect against a world where authoritarian regimes prioritize regime preservation and enrichment at the expense of their people and neighbors, according to Blinken.

The United States has faced criticism, though, for appearing to grant preferential treatment to some repressive regimes, leading to noticeable divisions in perceptions of the major powers, even within Western countries.

The GMF survey suggests that compared with older adults, younger respondents are more likely to view U.S. influence negatively and view Chinese and Russian influence more favorably.

As the world's preeminent economic and military powers chart the course for a new world order, concerns mount over potential risks, including military confrontations and even nuclear conflict.

“A direct military confrontation between the U.S. and China or the U.S. and Russia would be catastrophic, since all three are nuclear-armed superpowers,” said Taliaferro.

 

Israel and Hamas war.

7:05 p.m. . 

https://youtu.be/0anQIEeLonA?si=rF5IugTt2smdzc19

They had held the British against the Ottomans in the first world war as well. So the British limited Jewish immigration trying to appease both sides by the 1930s, Arabs and Jewish settlers had begun fighting openly in Palestine, the tragedy of Jews and Judaism reached an unbelievable apotheosis during the second world war, when the German Nazis under Hitler designed a horrific unimaginable plan to kill every Jew in their domain. In what is now known as the Holocaust. Enslaved, stopped and gassed to concentration camps where they were enslaved, stopped and gassed to death. It was beyond belief that human beings could sink to such depraved barbarism at the end of the second world war the urge to create a Homeland for Jews acquired a moral momentum when Jewish settlers discovered that the British were still reluctant to leave Jerusalem. They attacked the British soldiers and authorities and the matter went to the newly created United Nations in 1947, the year. India got independence, the UN War. Her to partition Palestine, the United Nations adopted, the resolution 181 according to it. There was to be an Arab State and a separate Jewish State. Palestinians rejected the resolution. They mainly pointed to things. One Jews were allotted, nearly fifty six percent of Palestine despite making up to 33% of the population in Palestine to choose were being allocated. The fertile, coastal region, until then Jews, own 6% of the Palestinian land. This, you and map change the reality soon. Jews began occupying. The land designated to them the Palestinians fought. But without much success by May 1948 Jews were in control of all of the land promised to them. Also some Arab territories on the 14th of May 1948. Israel became a country, it was a first Jewish state in 2000 years at its Helm was Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, Tel Aviv airport is now named after him. Of Israel, as a number or catastrophe that resulted in their disposition. This was the start of endless fighting a day after the creation of Israel Egypt. Jordan Syria, Lebanon and Iraq invaded Israel. The first arab-israeli war broke out, the Israelis fought off the Arabs. It also sees key territories in 1949 the UN brokered cease fires, Israel was given permanent control of these territories more than 700,000 Palestinians left is Rael, and Israel became a Jewish majority country in 1956. Focus shifted to this water body in particular. Is vital to trade as it. Connecting the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea in 1956, Egyptian president Gamal, Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal in response, Israel invaded Egypt, Britain and France, followed us and the Soviet Union, brokered a peace deal, but peace was short. In June of 1967, Israel carried out pre-emptive strikes on At Egyptian and Syrian Air Force's. This sparked a Six-Day War at the end of it. Israel captured the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip from Egypt from Jordan. It took the West Bank and East Jerusalem and Golan Heights from Syria. This real Palestine conflict took center stage in the 1972 Munich Olympics when extremists from the Black September group raided an Olympic Village. They killed two Israeli Athletes and took nine. Others hostage all of whom died. Eventually in 1973 Syria and Egypt. Day a surprise two-front War. It was Yom Kippur day the Armed Forces gained ground in a victory, which Egypt celebrates as historic. When it recovered, the whole of Sanai, America intervened to stop the water and lay the framework for an accord between the principal Nations Egypt and Israel in 1978 Egypt and Syria signed the Camp. David Accords. This led to 1979 egypt-israel. Peace Treaty. But all the while the question of Palestinian self-determination remained unresolved in 1980, Seven, Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip rose up against the Israeli government. It was the first intifada for the father, meaning shaking off in 1993 Oslo. One Accords were signed between Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization or PLO the negotiator that is my mu the bus. It was the first direct palestinian-israeli, peace agreement, and it set up a framework for the Palestinian self-governance in the West Bank and Gaza. Israeli and Palestinian leadership recognized Each other for the first time, this is then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. And this is the leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization, Yasser Arafat. See them shaking hands, this handshake, got them the Nobel Peace Prize, but was still evaded. In 1995, the Oslo to Accords were signed. Mandated Israeli withdrawal from six cities and 450 towns in the West Bank. Israel withdrew its troops from Gaza. In 2005, got to present the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The state of Palestine. The West Bank is home to three million Palestinians and more than half a million Jews. Israel administers the West Bank except East Jerusalem Mmm, the Palestinian National Authority. Governs a Palestinian Pockets. This is Gaza. It is a narrow 25 mile stretch of land. It is home to over two million. Palestinians, the Gaza Strip, is one of the world's most densely populated regions, it is under Israeli blockade. Since 2007 Gaza is under the control of Hamas, the group was founded in 1987, it won the election. In 2006. Western governments have branded Hamas, a terrorist organization Hamas. Orchestrated what is being called? A pearl? Arbor moment in West Asia, Israel is calling it its own 9/11 one that has killed the most number of Jews since the Holocaust there is no black and white in this conflict. Both Israelis and Palestinians. See the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea as their own. This land is sacred to Christians on the Israeli side. The Balfour Declaration as Israel's right to exist. The palace. Of that dispossession. Here is something quite often forgets about this declaration. It also mentioned that it was caught on court, clearly understood that nothing shall be done, which may Prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-jewish communities in Palestine, the Balfour, Declaration was signed in 1917, but between 1915 and 1916, a set of ten letters were exchanged between the British and Mecca Zamir, these letters known as the The idea of an independent Arab state is this conflict, a British Legacy something to think about here are something else? Why does a sustainable solution await the region? Despite years of diplomacy issues. Remain number one, the two-state solution, Hamas, rejects it, Israel says, a Palestinian state must be demilitarized to Jerusalem Palestinians want East Jerusalem to be the capital of their state Israel says Jerusalem. Aslam should remain. Its Eternal Capital, three refugees before this war more than 5.6 million Palestinian refugees were living in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, or in camps in Gaza and the West Bank Palestinians demand that the refugees be allowed to return to where their families live before the 1948 War Israel says any resettlement of Palestinian refugees must be outside its border. 

In this conflict no one has been able to broker peace. This is the biggest war in West Asia and fifty years and it stands to change the Strategic landscape of the region beyond recognition. 

1/Are all Jews Zionists?

1/Are all Jews Zionists? 

10:38 p.m.

And that's so Rabbi. Welcome to let the Quran speak. Thank you. It's an honor, a privilege to be on your program. No, it's wonderful to talk to you. So tell me Rabbi, why do you oppose the state of Israel? First of all, and why do you support Palestinians first? I prayed to the almighty that he stole from his truth. His wisdom that I may be worthy of conveying his message. And so sanctify his name, I. It's not my personal opinion. I'm representing with God's help the opinion of the very religious Jews around the world. Including in our Jerusalem, including well throughout Europe throughout the world. Basically, we, as a Jewish people, have made a covenant with God 3,000 years ago on Mount Sinai in Bossier of a man Moses went up and took the toll from God and maybe made a covenant up. About to uphold this Covenant to be close to the total. That is what Judaism is all about to uphold this Covenant to be close to the almighty to be subservient, to the almighty this movement the concept of creating a state sovereignty and with a Quantico a Jewish sovereignty that concept that was is a movement that started around. Years ago, it was a transformation from subservience to God. Internationalism has a piece of land to be a nation amongst Nations to be comparable to all the great countries. Now that in and of itself. Even if it would have not affected the Palestinian people, the inhabitants, the indigenous people. In other words, if the land would have been uninhabited, it would still be forbidden for the Jewish people. To have this concept of sovereignty of nationalism, because we have a long history, we made the Covenant with God, 3,000 years ago to uphold the Torah and we would then command it to go into the holy land and build a temple, which King Solomon built the temple, but we were warned by the almighty and instructed by the almighty that we have to be in a very high level of Spirituality, if not, then we will be driven from the land and that came around 2,000 years ago. The Romans at the Greeks they later came, they invaded the holy land and Jews were driven from the land as a nation. Once that happened, we were put under a decree of Exile and so the two thousand years were under the decree of Exile by the almighty, meaning that we are told. That we should not be the Sovereign Nation. We should be loyal citizens in every country where we reside. And we should not attempt to return and mass as a large group of people will try to recreate the event. Small one inch 1 cm of a Jewish sovereignty because it is like medicine from God to break our horniness. That we believe. So there is actually a tweet tweet. We put under three old sand that King Solomon, who built the temple had written a book of prophecies called She Reshiram Song of songs and he speaks about these three olds, that God put us under one, that we should not return and Mass to the Holy Land. Once we were dispersed amongst the Nations. Secondly, we are not to rebel against Any Nation. We have to be loyal citizens in every country, where you reside, a Canadian citizen has to pray for the well-being of the country. Even if you're not happy, well, let's say throughout History. Jews were many times forbidden to buy land and they were taxed two of the much higher degree still in all we have to be loyal citizens and not rebel against that country. Thirdly we are not to make any attempt to end Exile. Why? Because it's, because of our sins. We are spread out. God is compassionate and the almighty when the time will come, which every Jew yearns for, the time will eventually come with the almighty will make. A metaphysical. Change in the world and all Humanity will Oh God, then God will return us and God himself will build. We built the temple without any human intervention. They will be a spirit, a chimeric evil spirit in the world. Still stopping atheists and so forth. Everybody will believe in God. It says, they are also cool about Google Earth as all the nations will hold hands and join to serve God. Then we will return and we will become close to God again inside that. How, how does that come about? Like how would you know that we're in that state? Would because like I said, they will be a Spirit of godliness that will be a spirit of people returning the Messiah. See, obviously the Jewish and Muslim people have a distinctly different concept of what the Messiah is mashiach, but we believe, but that's, that's really new here, nor there because the, because what will happen? It will happen. And we will never deal with the threat for the Muslim people because of the difference in our approach, because we are clearly as I've mentioned we are forbidden to make any attempts to return. Just believe, and we pray to God constantly that he should bring about this end days. And when all Humanity will serve him. So every year and to return We urine with all our hearts we say it in our everyday and our prayers that we want, but we are. But we haven't had it for 2,000 years. We are patient. Wait, and we serve God upholding the tour of the Covenant. In every land where we are being loyal citizens, and so forth, Zionism, 

Nationalist movement of people. Those who were estranged themselves from God, from the Torah they were not religious. I do it back to carry around the picture of the first. This was the Declaration of Independence. The first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and they made a so-called Jewish State 1948. Yes, it's Jewish. Supposedly they're doing us the returning to God, the things at the end of Exile and not one of them is covering their heads. CeCe, what the foolishness of it but still in all design is they put on a facade and they of Judaism, they Incorporated religion in order that the world should say. Oh, it's a religious thing. We have to support them. The Evangelistic Christians in the millions and millions support them Jews, who don't know the total? Well, fortunately, the more non-religious and this is over when they have this emotional playing that you know that. Oh, Oh, it's returning. Two thousand years were in Exile. That's the difference between Judaism designers now so in other words, ensure the very concisely Judaism is subservience to God. Zionism is nationalism. And it's expressly forbidden for us. So around the world who know about what community if you go to Argentina, you go to England, Stanford Hills in London, New York, where we're from the very religious community and in Jerusalem the variable Is community because in total opposition to the creation of the state. And and now we have to hit something very important than in other words for us to have a state as I said, with a even another habit of their butt in that, they created this state in a land that they needed for their purpose and it will falestine the Palestine was an inhabited and the majority were Muslims. The second group of people that live there in numbers with them over the Christians and the third with the Choose because as individuals, we were allowed to go by, oh God were permitted to live there but not as a nation. So in order for them to create their state, they had to expel at least on the best of the Palestinian people that is, it's against the flies in the face of what I would tour is about because in the Torah it says Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not steal. We have to be ma hoorah who my father is. God is compassionate. We have to be compassionate. I mean Anna. Certainly not to steal, kill and expel people. How dare they and and on top of that, we have to remember that in these 2,000 years of Exile that we've suffered so much because we are Jews the Jews were burnt at the stake. They were tried, they will try. They try to forcefully bring virtue to them in the Crusades by the acquisition and where they were, they were expelled from Spain from Italy for where did the Jews go? The Muslim lands. 

The Jews, they embraced us, and every Muslim land Iran. We have you like Palestine was under the Ottoman Empire. They took us in and we flourished in their lives. That we do human rights goes to protect us. yet. We flourish, it wasn't necessary you have. So now for the zionists to come along and accuse the Muslims of an ingrained hate of the Jews, or the Palestinian people. and on a great day, how dare they be repugnant, how and where we have to show the total required. Us to show gratitude for people and to go and turn that on its head. And 

These people are wrong. Does this prove this is the most Criminal part of this one weekly Arab and Muslim in the Palestinian people would pull the knocked over here. We have a picture here, even you can see how they live together. We babysat each other's children in total. Peace, this cancer. That is why they are very religious around the world. We stand in total support, we hurt. We cry with the Palestinians, we are humiliated because The zionists took our religion and they are using it as a tool to intimidate and silence other people. First, if you speak up against any gold out the Semitic, so we the religious communities stay in that opposition how do you oppose the Zionist movement? Well, the first thing is We believe we, first of all, we do not accept it, we do that partner partner, participate with them. We have very religious communities that do not serve in the He certainly not the they, they they don't go voting, they have nothing to do with the state. We have a rap in it. There the zionists made a rabbit or for this facade with a mass grave in juicer. They made a rabbi it with the chief Rabbi and this is all by us. Irrelevant we have a rabbit, we had in the 1940 mid-1920s. The chief Rabbi of the religious community. That was living there for hundreds of years, Rabbi sonnenfeld. And he met with the king of transjordan. A 1920s, that's way before the Clear, our loyalty and that we don't want to say we passed on in 1947, 1948. The chief Rabbi was robbed by the schinsky, the Zionist, then we'll do very well during our time out, to be very successful and having the United Nations, the Britain Britain to their to get all recognized so rabbis on of Earth are barraged by the schinsky Blessed memory. This is the record of the United Nations in 1947. A declaration before the United Nations. He said 

10:49 p.m.

We furthermore. They any particles like this is the very real just representing the religious Jewish communities that we don't want the Jewish State. And these people are imposters to want to do it. And the history is, will he passed on. We took the next you can see hundreds of thousands of people in the streets of Jerusalem taking up our next chief Rabbi. When he passed on, we have hundreds of thousands of Jews living there now, under this either her, a this God-fearing community that does not recognize the authority of the state of Israel. They in fact, they didn't straight daily with a demonstrate and they see children get up. We never carry arms. We're not noted, they get heated and get assassinated rabbis. This is, it's unbelievable. You can go to our site and Kusa and see how and the world is silent. They don't even talk about the fact that Jews daily are demonstrating against the occupation. And the, it's, it's just, it's screams to the, to the skies. What was Happening the Injustice to the Palestinian people and to the Jewish people who are living there, who refuses to accept this Authority? It's Arab idea. Do you Ally yourself with other Jews who are not Orthodox? Who oppose the state of Israel? Oh that is a very good question. We being that there was the reform movement that 250 years ago and our rabbis at that time issued a fatwa basically rabbis of Europe when they said this is Torah. They don't eat kosher. They don't give the ten commands. They don't keep the Shabbath, the Sabbath so they simply are not affiliated with them, so we work with the Muslim people, we work with the Palestinian people and they'll come to the same demonstrations but we won't have the joint activities directly. But if that did we you know, we just put they do a lot of them, you know, a lot of people who are Jewish who are not religious, they have other feel as human rights human rights all because even other Jewish Reasons that they'll stand up in opposition. There's many really tens and tens of thousands of War who are posing the occupation but we are coming from the core issue. That the zionists are claiming the legitimacy we are telling them tells the world that they're coming. The world, it's unacceptable. So we're coming from the religious State and here it is a picture of a girl behind bars. Every boy and girl turns 17 becomes a criminal from the religious community. Because they refused to serve in the Army because in the IDF, which is mandatory military service. So these are all very, very critical issues. Why is it so critical for people to understand because people this is what is very widely. They're more efficient than what the new design is. And they like to refer to themselves as a Jewish State. The insist they're equal to being referred to as a Jewish State. Why? Because then they know that if anybody wants to oppose what they're doing, criminalize the Palace, People that hit you, the homes that steal, that kill, that do so many terrible crimes. But if you say a word, oh, you are speaking Against The Godly religion. So you attack this being anti-semitic and now they just made a new law here. They're trying to pass the I ihra. I think that's going to say that if you speak up against Zionism or the state of Israel, it's anti-semitic. What could be more obvious criticism of what could be more unacceptable? Such a concept when the very religious communities are being oppressed and insisting. We are just my grandparents who were killed in Auschwitz. Most of our communities are immigrants from Europe. We died. Because we were Jews because we've insisted on remaining this religion that our covenant to God. And we did not accept that because we've suffered that therefore we're going to turn around and occupy another people that's the we suffer. Now we should go sit in our And killing and doing against God's Will. And so we gave our lives by stealing and killing and doing against God's Will. And so we are against design. And we are being oppressed by the Jewish people who didn't find a home in Palestine and we're living there, these immigrants and they were living there. The try to catch the Brethren so much suffering, all of a sudden, they were they enjoyed being under the authority of the Ottoman Empire and all of a sudden they're thrown under the Zionist control and told that if you stand up and oppose this we do I can spot you are thrown into prison. You were a criminal, how the world. Authority to dictate in our religion. What is it? Instead of respecting our Scholars, our, which you have here in Canada. If you haven't the United States, we have our community. Let's say in New York, it's the largest concentration of religious Jews where I yeah, we've been right across from Manhattan Williamsburg Brooklyn miles and miles and there's not one single Israeli flag. I was the chief Rabbi of Palestine by title. And this And and Pious people, and done, and the businessmen. And they all insist that we are a religion to serve, God and God forbid that we should accept the occupation. And now of some, like, we decide to speak up against this rebelling against God in the name of my religion and, and go out to the world that they're imposters. They use my region so that we should be people. Who will stand this together with us to be accused of being a Semitic. That is unjust. It's unacceptable and we decry that and that's what we do with the power we try with God's help, we pray to God that he should read the speedy and peaceful dismantlement. This thing at the same time we go to the United Nations. We go with Palestinian people to cry there, there to speak, both of the demonstrations to try to educate. We go to the universities. The college's to come To the politicians. We took to the other two but have them change their approach and not to support the oppression of the Palestinian people. Rabbi. Thank you for sharing with us today. We really appreciate it. I learned so much, and I'm honored that you came and joined us today. I'll go up to do it again whenever we could expand on all the different issues. And I will tell you the history of how we live together. Yes. And Harmony and so it's such a beautiful sort of God, and But was never an impediment here, right? Yeah, I have so much to talk about. 

https://youtu.be/U2H-F0HVKDY?si=uJW4D4bUqOJNLzBU

Zionism is about the pursuit of an independent Jewish state. The word is derived from Zion, a hill near the city of Jerusalem. But nowhere near all Jews live in Israel and not all inhabitants of Israel are Jewish.

The birth of the State of Israel

For centuries, Jews have lived all over the world. Almost every country has its own Jewish minority. Two countries have a large Jewish community: Israel and the United States (both around 6 million people). But out of a population of more than 300 million, the 6 million Jews in the United States are but a small minority. In Israel, on the other hand, almost 80% of the population is Jewish.

The state of Israel was founded after the Second World War, in 1948. In the Middle East, in a place where Jews had lived for thousands of years with their Arab neighbours. Because of their history and religion, Jews had felt a strong connection with this region for generations. Many European Jews who had survived the Holocaust, went to live in Israel after the war. Many Jews from Arab (Muslim) countries also fled or migrated to Israel.

The United Nations supported the division of what was then still called Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab part. And they supported the creation of the new state of Israel. Among the Arab population, however, there was a lot of resistance. Immediately after the creation of the State of Israel, five neighbouring Arab countries declared war on Israel. Israel won that war. Many Arab residents of the region had to flee the country. The seventy-year history of the State of Israel is characterised by the struggle with the Palestinians. They see Israel as the occupying force. 

The difference between Zionists, Jews and Israelis

Back to the question. So a Zionist is someone who strives for an independent Jewish state. To many religious Jews, Israel is 'the promised land'. But many non-religious Jews, too, value the fact that there is a country where Jews can live in freedom and safety. 

Nowadays, the word Zionist is often used as a swearword. As a negative label. Many Palestinians and supporters of the Palestinian cause no longer distinguish between the words 'Jew', 'Israeli' and 'Zionist'. That is not correct. Most Jews do not live in Israel. Not every inhabitant of Israel is Jewish; there are also many non-Jews living in Israel. And not all Jewish Israelis are 'settlers' who want to conquer more and more Palestinian land. 

The vast majority of Jews believe that the State of Israel should continue to exist. But many Jews, both living in Israel and elsewhere, are in favour of a Palestinian state alongside Israel as a possible solution to the conflict. 

To cut a long story short: although many Jews identify with Zionism, there are still many different points of view. That is reason enough not to mix up the words 'Jew', 'Israelis' and 'Zionists'. 

2 /Why did Hitler hate the Jews? 

Hitler did not invent the hatred of Jews. He capitalised on antisemitic ideas that had been around for a long time.

Hitler was born in Austria in 1889. He developed his political ideas in Vienna, a city with a large Jewish community, where he lived from 1907 to 1913. In those days, Vienna had a mayor who was very anti-Jewish, and hatred of Jews was very common in the city. 

During the First World War (1914-1918), Hitler was a soldier in the German army. At the end of the war he, and many other German soldiers like him, could not get over the defeat of the German Empire. The German army command spread the myth that the army had not lost the war on the battlefield, but because they had been betrayed. By a ‘stab in the back’, as it was called at the time. Hitler bought into the myth: Jews and communists had betrayed the country and brought a left-wing government to power that had wanted to throw in the towel.

By blaming the Jews for the defeat, Hitler created a stereotypical enemy. In the 1920s and early 1930s, the defeated country was still in a major economic crisis. According to the Nazis, expelling the Jews was the solution to the problems in Germany.

This political message and the promise to make Germany economically strong again won Hitler the elections in 1932. After he had come to power, the laws and measures against the Jews increased all the time. It ended in the Shoah, the Holocaust, the murder of six million European Jews.

UN, Isreal Representative. 

Why did Israeli Intelligence Fail so Disastrously? Analyzing the context of Israeli -Hamas war. How Mossad Failed.

7:23 p.m.

"Where there is no guidance, a nation falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety." (Proverbs 11:14)"

What does the Mossad motto "By way of deception, thou shalt do war" mean? It's a biblical quote. In Hebrew - Betahbulot Ta'aseh Milhama -בתחבולות תעשה לך מלחמה . It means exactly what it says, deception is a valuable weapon .

Mossad formed 13 December 1949 (as the Central Institute for Coordination)

It was the worst attack on Israel in 50 years and I am salty, so, unexpected and so bloody that it's been compared to everything from Pearl Harbor to 911 when militants from Hamas and Palestine Islamic Jihad smashed through the Gaza border on October the 7th, they were just conducting a rage. They were embarking on an invasion that will become as Central to Israeli history as the surprise attack by Egypt and Syria that opens the Kippur War. And a comparison isn't accidental for strikes. The 1973 conflict caught the Jewish State completely off guard while Rail would ultimately Prevail over its neighbors, the failure to predict the attack would go down as the country's greatest intelligence failure until now with over 1200 Israelis confirmed dead at the time of writing the Hamas. Assault is thought to be the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust a day that would like to Clips, even the Yom Kippur War as opening salvos in the Israelis ikey. So how did this happen? How did such complex plans escape the notice of Israelis feared intelligence Services? Well, in today's war, a graphic special unit Dive deep into these spectacular failures that made October the 7th possible when assessing the salt from Gaza the began around Dawn on October the 7th 2023, major near dinar of the Israeli Defense Forces. Didn't mince words? This is our 911. He told journalists they got us for Americans, the statement likely brought back memories of Day in 2001. However, a boring ordinary Tuesday Morning in September suddenly shatters Americans' sense of security and seems to crumble alongside the towers collapsing into a dust cloud of anxiety of pain. And of Rage. It's evocative as if it was Major Dierden are statements likely underplayed the true impact of her master's attack as were on the Rocks? Pointed out Israel's much smaller population means the number of confirmed casualties October the 7th alone was the equivalent of 20,000. Americans being killed. A number that has since risen sharply and undoubtedly horrific as 9/11 was the attacks didn't end with Mast Al-Qaeda, operatives going door-to-door in American towns. Dragging people away as hostages or murdering them in the beds. Even the obvious comparison point in Israeli. History of the Egyptian and Syrian strikes that began the Yom Kippur War. Almost exactly 50 years ago, there was arguably nothing on October 7th. Shocking is the twin souls were they ultimately killed fewer people about 320 Israelis died on the first day and nearly All of them were soldiers nor did the Egyptian or Syrian Army's ever breached the nation's defenses to kidnap civilians. We mentioned this not to wallow in the unprecedented nature of her master's assault but to hammer home will be on Main seem in this video that this constitutes the worst intelligence failure in Israeli history. That is our job today to try and shine at least some light on just how that happens before we probably begin. We obviously should include a caveat, obviously, the Fallout from my Master's attack is still ongoing. That means Everyone in Israel, is in the mood to comb through the country's failures as cheap military spokesman rear Admiral, Daniel hug re told reporters quote first, we fight then we investigate that means the information we're working with is necessarily incomplete. The true picture likely would become clear the many months following much official soul-searching still thus far as anyone can tell right now there were some clear factors that fed into Saturday's disaster factors that will be analyzed in upcoming chapters first though. So that we want to emphasize just how big a screw up. This really was October. The 7th began with over 2,000 Rockets being fired from Gaza into Israel and a mixture of long-range missiles, shoulder-launched weapons mortars and homemade devices that are wildly inaccurate, while both Mars and Palestine, Islamic Jihad, repeatedly fired Rockets into Israel before. They've usually numbered in the dozens just amassing enough Firepower to launch, this barrage must have taken planning and operational secrecy on an extraordinary scale. I'll then come to the attack itself. at 45, Gaza, border and initial force of four hundred masked where they used explosives and bulldozers to break through and 30 points before flooding into Southern Israel at the initial assault Force crossed in up to 1100, additional Fighters followed as they did. So the observation towers were attacked with drones, paraglider units flew over fences, assault, cruising boats, and tried to land on beaches to assemble so much material for such a vast attack. Should have been impossible as there should have been the presence of so many fighters. The border as former US ambassador to Israel, David Freeman told NBC. I've never seen the Border breached in this matter. Usually 

Even the one person from Gaza gets close to these  Border are intercepted and neutralized long before they can do anything, even a massive claim that they were caught off guard by the ease of entering Israel. Speaking to reporters' leadership. Figure, all Ibarra hair declared, we were surprised by this great collapse, we were planning to make some games that take prisoners to exchange them. The IDF was a paper tiger given that Israel's intelligence service is regarded as the best in the world. It is staggering that plans of this magnitude were not noticed early. Earlier Garza is one of the most surveilled places on Earth with electronic human assets, monitoring everything that's happening. If the Mouse farts the government is going to know about it yet in the end, all that turned out to be the naught and Invasion plan that like, it could have been detected or went unnoticed until it was too late. The question now is how 

In early assessments, Israeli officials speaking anonymously have repeatedly highlighted one major flaw at the border with Gaza, massive over Reliance on technology flagging the Gaza Strip on two sides, Israel's border system was dubbed by Former Defense Minister Betty Gantz as the iron wall and not to the country's Iron Dome missile defense system, but the phrase is misleading, come during images of an impregnable Bessel barrier, soaring high into the Sky Rose, and thick impractical iron daughter. Instead relied on technology to keep 

Biddable the Gaza border bristles with radar Laughs out. What paper? This is a high-tech approach looking for biddable, the Gaza border bristles with radar and sensors that can detect any breach even if it takes place underground cameras, unmanned robots and remotely operated machine guns. Keep watch for any movement in the air, arrows, darts, provide a bird's-eye view, everything is monitored in real and relayed Back To Human operators and control rooms built over three years and costing billions of shekels. The Border was a response to Hamas's 2014 incursions into Israel fire network of tunnels, but was also called of a wider Drive in the Israeli military. Going away from boots on the ground and towards high-tech surveillance with a danger of a Yom Kippur War style attack from nation states to me on the Wane the IDF has turned in recent years towards strategies for defeating or containing non-state groups like Hamas and Hezbollah in practice. That boils down to heavy investment in stuff, like intelligence inside the capabilities at the expense of traditional forces, the Wall Street Journal as details. How the number of noncommissioned officers. True example was slashed by 10% over the last 8 years, or Or is breaking defense. Summed it up quote, the overall theme in Israel in the last several years has been investment in technology and digitization for Warfare end, quote, the Gaza border was part of this a way of harnessing Israel's world-class technical abilities to create a woman in crude terms self since it really seems absurd name is seems that the idea of group, fortunately, it worked out the armhole and a weak point that no one had thought. Such a foundation. So corroded so Rusty that they would bring the whole edifice crashing down. These would be either cellular towers that formed the backbone of the surveillance system. Speaking of the New York Times, Israeli officials have described how Hamas' first move was to use drones to attack and destroy the borders. Towers , unable to transmit or receive signals, the smart system was rendered blind. The census failed to report. The breaches soldiers and control rooms could monitor the attack of our cameras, but the IDF's technology Advantage, eliminated, amassed, didn't need anything. More high tech than bulldozers and explosives to smash holes in the fences unprepared for an old-fashioned ground. Assault those monitoring the Iron Wall were completely caught off guard? Yes, it wasn't only at the Gaza border where a Reliance on technology made the stage slow and complacent with the Iron Dome missile defense system. So good at shooting down dozens of rockets, no one seemed prepared for the idea that a barrage of thousands could completely overwhelm it on the intelligence side, the security services were so assured in their ability to monitor electronic networks. That they seem to have forgotten those conversations. Take place in reel life in the months leading up to the attack of intelligence wiretap to Hamas. Operatives, whose conversation seemed to indicate their no appetite for an overall relationship with Israel today. All those conversations may have been staged by an agency. Knew the Israelis were listening. You are the past. Leadership dish. Their phones computers and develops their plans through face-to-face conversations in the room. Shielded from Electronics, beeping of course. While they were over alarms on fancy gadgets, its real Security Services hadn't completely abandoned old-fashioned methods of intelligence gathering that had failed then. We want technology, it's doubtful. Things could have gotten as bad as they did know, it seems the other 

Take everyone made was a classic one of human psychology. A mistake that has brought ruin upon Nations and army. Since the first human tribes fought one another in prehistory the mistake of underestimating your enemy. 

7:32 p.m.

Are persistent. Belief What about me is touching flaws as human beings are persistent. Belief that even the most awful people could change that the abuser really will stop hurting their partner that the serial killer by truly feel some remorse for their victims on the scale, it seems like the Israeli State grown to believe this about a mask just days before the attack newspaper haaretz reported that an intelligence assessment conclude at the terror group wanted to crows avoid a full-fledged war with Israel and didn't want to jeopardize past achievements. That better the lives of the Gods and residents. It's from a purely material perspective. This made perfect sense, following the 2021 war in Gaza, the Israeli government made the decision to try and stabilize the strip's impoverished economy, offering the carriers of improved livelihoods to deter further attacks this from happening out tens of thousands of workers to Garza's two million residents - there's allowed them to cross the border into Israel to do jobs with salaries 10 times those in Gaza by one, count the money. This brought to the strip the improvement of the lives of 100,000 people with an economic picture. So he brought You to order a mass, but want you to hold onto their games. They certainly acted that way from 20 21 until October the 7th 2023, the group refrain from launching attacks even as Palestine Islamic Jihad continued firing Rockets into Israel. So convincing was the group's new focus on the economy that even some of them are supporters who criticize that we're going soft as one enormous Israeli official, limited to the telegraph they caused us to think they wanted money. It's no doubt helps this. It's sprinkled with examples of Terror groups, and militants, who voluntarily lay down their arms or dissolve after some peace agreement. On the other hand, it was still an awfully big leap of faith. Especially given the Hamas. Its founding document the Covenant literally includes passages saying things like Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it and the day of judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews. Killing the Jews as a former National Security adviser he acted as an amateur or told the Washington Post is roommate. Made a huge mistake believing that a terror organization can change. Its DNA, get the blind spots in intelligence when further than just thinking cool is an awesome pretty chill. Now, as we said at the end of the last chapter, this desire to believe the best is fatally mixed with another dangerous assumption, but Hamas, or too weak to pose the threat names, like the Shin Bet, and the message is respected and feared the world over in Gaza. The intelligence Services seemed almost like ghosts able to assassinate Hamas leaders as they slept in their Beds able to destroy underground tunnels without warning as the security services, green, more convinced of their phone and vulnerability. It seems their simple taneous Lee lost any respect for her master's skills To avoid the terror group could rehearse their October the 7th operation openly, and have it dismissed as mere posturing and we really do. You mean openly here? The telegraph reports that Hamas constructed a fake Israeli settlement in Gaza to train attackers to fly, just filmed themselves training on paragliders to swoop down into populated areas. The idea that he's real Security Services were Not immediately firing others, practice taking hostages and firing Rockets. The idea that he's real Security Services were not aware of these exercises is just absurd. Most likely they saw them checked the exercises against intelligence saying a mask with no attack, and decide that the training was all to show a little propaganda stunt since nothing more than speaking to break in defense Middle East Institute, senior fellow glass. Orb was blunt in his criticism stating there was a failure of imagination first and foremost a total disrespect. The opponents with these words, he was echoing, the 9/11 Commission report, which found quote a failure of imagination to be the most important factor in why warning signals have an impending attack weren't taken more seriously. Sadly it now appears the same story unfolded in Israel, the regional superpower like America in early 2001. So convinced of its strength. But it barely paid attention to the terrorists plotting to do it harm. Just as with 911 Torres a catastrophe of this magnitude, can't be blamed on overconfidence, that the On technology, there were multiple other factors at play from Individual, incompetence to sheer bad luck. 

We're making a video like this. It can be easy to focus only on systemic problems to try and interrogate the big picture and not sweat the details. And again history has shown that world events can hinge on small personal decisions had Archduke Franz Ferdinand, ordered his driver to return past the scene of an You receive. 

Happens. It seems, this was at least partly true in October. The 7th in ways, both big and small individuals made decisions that alone were not humorous, but taken together added up to catastrophe of these. Perhaps the greatest votive will forever float around the alert. The New York Times revealed it had been sent just before the attack began noticing a surge in activity in Gaza. The Israeli intelligence sent a warning to soldiers at the border, on the way before Masters operational yet began. But as the paper of record notes, Get it, all the soldiers didn't get it, all the soldiers, didn't read it though. Seemingly minor decisions would turn out to be equally consequential; the same article also reports the stunningly bad decision to have all senior officers from the IDF's Garza division, group together on one base, when the Millers and storms that base. They effectively decapitated the division's leadership; almost every senior officer in the area was killed or kidnapped in the raid's opening hours as a result. No one was able to coordinate a coherent response. We measure these incidents. Lot of people try to cast blame for this massacre on Individual soldiers. Rather the point is to try and illustrate the cascading failures that needed to take place for something like this to happen. There's a reason that for all our guides, trying 9/11 was a one-off. It required a perfect storm of Wishful, Thinking intelligent say, isn't bad luck, learning to read the portents of such a storm. Could stop another from ever breaking out a game and the portents may not have even been that hard to discern and Anonymous Egyptian officials briefed Cairo. Told the Israelis something big is coming. Ready for that warning to be ignored within Israel itself. Some believe that this Litany of bad decisions, extended to the very top of government specifically left leaving newspaper hurries is accused. Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu of allowing a mass to remain in power in Gaza to act as a counter to the more moderate fat ruling party in the West Bank. According to the Paper Source Netanyahu openly gleams in 2019 at a meeting of his liquid party that quote anyone who wants to think the establishment of a Palestinian State as just boarded bolstering a mass and Money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank. Now, we should be careful to note that these claims haven't been confirmed by their Outlets still they speak to the potential naivete with which Israel's longest-serving leader near Vue de masas useful idiots who kept the Palestinians bickering internally rather than uniting against the Israelis in this telling the government's convinced itself. It was able to keep a mass in check but occasionally the tree. Nations euphemistically called. Mowing the grass would leave the group too weak to pose much of a threat, but strong enough to keep challenging for tars claim to speak for all Palestinians, is this true who knows? There's an Yahoo supporters? Would point to the fact that her Reds have been gunning for the Prime Minister for years. Now still The Mention Of Israel's prime minister does at least provide a springboard to bring us on to our last chapter today. The chapter where we discuss, how a paralyzed polarized, political system, diverted the nation's attention when it most needed to focus? 

The basis of any good magic trick is to divert your audience's attention to get the focus on something innocuous away from what is really happening. It was eyeballing a way you could almost say that this is what Hamas achieved prior talked over the 7th even as they were preparing for an assault into Israel. The governments and intelligence Services were focused Elsewhere on the West Bank and the northern border with Lebanon here, though. Our analogy breaks down because it wasn't a mask that succeeded in diverting everyone's attention, but it was, the Israeli state. Himself, the full story is a little bit complicated, but the basic version is that Israel's current government came to power with heavy support among settler communities in the West Bank in many ways you could say, it was a government of. And for the settlers, the finance minister. Bezalel Smotrich for one is a vocal proponent of an X in the West Bank. And a strong supporter of Jewish settlements. Nor is my church, The only ones with some Coalition members rooted in these communities. It was only natural, the government would take more interest in the region particularly as violence the end of flare between extremists. Settlers emboldened by the new government and Palestinian groups hoping to destroy the settlements. The result was a recent upsurge in West Bank violence, violence the government was determined to get to grips with. So is it to the army, they saw months ago, there were 13 battalions stationed at the West Bank, to keep the peace by this June that number had grown to 25. That means thousands of ideal troops were reassigned to the region and troops. Who could have possibly been otherwise Manning the border with Gaza. We say possibly because there's 

7:41 p.m.

Hand, no trade-off on the other hand, former idea of military intelligence Chief, a hero on cv4 Akash has been pretty explicit telling the Washington Post quote. There was a need for more soldiers so where did they take them from from the Gaza border where they thought it was calm? If this was the case, then it's hard to blame them. Not only was violence rising in the West Bank but the intelligence Services were briefing that Israel's biggest threat came from Lebanon in the north. where Iran Allied Hezbollah, holds large swaths of territory still. Even if it was on Edible the focus on areas far from Garza, undoubtedly contributed to the security labs around to Mars, not that it was the only contributing factor. There's also the little matter of Israel's recent descent into full-blown chaos. If you follow international news, you're no doubt aware of the major judicial overall netanyahu's government has been pursuing to strip away the independence of the chords, and effectively remove checks and balances on the ruling Coalition airpower, the merits or otherwise of this plan and neither here nor there. What's important is that? These proposed changes have shattered Israeli Society. Eating since the Jewish state has been roiled by the largest mass protests in his history, that may have affected the military's ability to do its job. Many reservists declared they wouldn't report for Duty others. Found their defense. We're getting sucked into a politicized gladiator Arena where they were forced to pick a side but this unrest was potentially blunting. The country's military Effectiveness did not go unnoticed by the defense Chiefs. Former Intelligence Officer Morel came out to publicly say the crisis was weakening Israel. The idea of a vision statement saying it was damaged, Comfortable, declaring the chief of his beloved, even feel comfortable, declaring the crows Israel once formidable Regional power, it's gradually eroded in face of Consciousness, self-assurance and humility. Wally judicial overhaul was an internal matter. It would be naive to think the disorder wasn't noticed by our masters. We're on the Rocks noted terrorists are always studying their enemies and probing for opportunities to strike, precisely 0, and their opponents are distracted or preoccupied with other matters and Israeli society has perhaps never been so distracted. A occupies the dividers, it was in these past months, a distraction, the may have ultimately had terrible consequences for everybody. So at the end of that analysis, then we're left with a few hints as to what went wrong, frustrating fragments of a whole picture or you can't make out fragments that are nonetheless, big enough for us to still see what a spectacular failure. This was in the histories of Nations. There are moments that bind people together and there are moments that drive them apart. Maybe you expose a culture at its best or maybe you expose the vulnerabilities and dangerous assumptions of a society grown complacent as we record this video. With the mask still ongoing, there's talk that things could get even worse than they are now. But Hezbollah might attack from the North or Syria from the East so that Israel May wind up going to war with Iran. If any of this comes to pass, then the coming weeks and months will certainly contain many of these moments moments when Israel, you know it's like never before and moments Things happen that it's people would rather forget you, no matter what the future holds there is no doubt that October the 7th will remain the date. Everyone remembers the day. When Israel, self-assurance crumbled as suddenly and just tragically as America's did on September the 11th 2001, we can only hope that when the dust finally, settles that we some chance to reflect to figure out what truly went wrong on that awful day and use that knowledge to ensure no generation of asked to live through such Horror ever again.

https://youtu.be/Sqpur37h2jY?si=___u_yUwo4GCI1kI

How Israel was Created.

9:29 p.m. October 12,2023

How Israel was Created.

A letter written by Balfour. That would set off a conflict, still being fought more than 100 years later. His Majesty's government views with favor. The Establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and we'll use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object. When Balfour wrote of his government's intent to create, Create a Jewish homeland in Palestine, 90% of the people living there. They were not Jewish just 31 years later. Most of them were gone . 

This is the story of the British promise that led to the destruction of Palestine and the creation of the state of Israel. 

Let's start with the obvious question. Why would the British make promises about other people's countries short answer? The Empire is one hell of a drug. This was World War One and the British were making lots of promises. In addition to promising a Jewish homeland in Palestine, they promised Arab leaders Independence. If they rose up against Prince's enemy, the Ottoman Empire, the Arabs did Hollywood even made a movie about it Arabia's for the atoms. Now, that's what I've told them. Anyway, that's what they think. That's why they're fighting. Oh, surely a month after golfers letter, British troops took Palestine, ending, 400 years of Ottoman rule, the people who lived there were Arabs mostly Muslims, but they were Christian and Jewish minorities to there was also Also, a tiny number of European Jews, who in the late 1800s have started building small colonies there at a time when many Jews were suffering horrific persecution in Europe, they felt Palestine could be an escape the idea of building up a Jewish presence in Palestine became known as Zionism. But estate of the Fringe movement among European Jews. Many of them felt they shouldn't have to leave their countries to avoid persecution but Zionism as a political movement took a big step forward with An Austrian man called Theodor herzl. And this guy is a very important name in this story in 1896, he published during you did stock or in English, the Jewish state in it, he said the only way for choose to avoid Europe's anti-Semitism was not just to leave but to have their own country and herzl didn't just write the next year. He organized the conference in Basel. Switzerland. The first Zionist Congress, the attendees agreed on a program, which sought And promote to establish, a Jewish homeland in Palestine and promote Jewish settlement in Palestine, from here, on out the Zionist movement became very active setting up funds to promote Jewish immigration to Palestine companies to buy land there and recruiting representatives to advocate for their cause with different government's, a few days after the conference herzl wrote this and his diary at causal. I founded the Jewish state in five years perhaps and certainly In 50 years, everyone will perceive it. He was only off by one year, okay? So that is a lot of history, but it's important because the Zionist movement is a critical part of the story going forward especially after a found a friend in the British government where a lot of high-ranking officials supported Zionism. Sometimes for unexpected reasons, prime minister Lloyd George. For example, there was a Christian Zealot who believed Gathering the Jewish people in Palestine, Bring Jesus Christ back to Earth, others like Balfour, believe that getting the Jewish people out of Europe and into their own country would be a good thing. Herzl was pretty Visionary when he wrote that the anti-semitic Nations will become our allies. Meanwhile design is a shortbread in that their future country would be a reliable Ally. So that's the backstory of how European anti-Semitism Zionism and British imperialism, all led to the Balfour Declaration. This British promise to build a Homeland for Jews in Palestine. 

Now we're going to look at how branded that world war one had been a conflict between rival Empires and the winner set up the League of Nations to distribute the losing sides territories between them. They called it the mandate system putting territories once controlled by the Ottoman and German Empires under the quote tutelage of advanced Nations until they became independent and were given the Mandate over Palestine, but the Palestinian people were never asked. What they wanted, what Independence would look like to them. Listen to what Balfour wrote to one of his colleagues in Palestine. We do not propose, even to go through the form of Consulting. The wishes of the present inhabitants of the country. It's dead. It was the zionists who consulted about what their vision for Palestine was. And so the Mandate ended up incorporating, not just the Balfour Declaration but several Clauses requiring Britain to ensure the establishment of a Jewish Home in Palestine. British rule was very accommodating to the Zionist project. The Jewish community in Palestine grew with big waves of immigration. They had their own schools and factories and even their own militia the haganah and they were led by the polish-born David Ben-Gurion, the leader of their representative body, the Jewish agency to the Palestinians it was clear that Britain was in delivering them Independence. It was delivering their country. Forces 1936. They went on strike British forces, tried to break the strike with arrests torture Mass punishment and executions leaders were exiled weapons confiscated, and house has blown up, Palestinian Fighters attacked British in Jewish targets while British and hagana forces would carry out joint raids on Palestinian Villages something had to change the British government sent a commission called the peel commission to figure it out, but their proposed, Ian was typical just draw another British line on the map, divide. The country. Give this part to the Jews and this part to the Palestinians. I make that part of Transjordan next door. Oh, and because the Palestinians were a majority in the country 250,000 of them would have to be removed by force to make the Jewish State viable. Remember these were the proposals that were meant to calm things down. Spoiler, they didn't instead the Revolt continued until 1939 by which time About 10% of Palestine's adult male population. Had either been killed, injured, arrested or exiled the British government really needed a solution. So here comes another report. The commission is studying the 20 year old Jewish settlements in the British Mandate of Palestine. The 1939 whitepaper created a conflict between the British and the zionists for the first time because it rejected partition and said, the solution was for Palestine to gain independence within 10 years with everyone living there. Airing it together, crucially. It also imposed severe limits on Jewish land purchases and immigration to the zionists. This felt like a betrayal in response to some set off bombs across the country killing dozens of Palestinians, but soon everyone was distracted by something much bigger. More than 60 million people were killed in World War Two including six million, Jews were murdered in Nazi death camps, Jewish survivors, fled Europe with a large number of them trying to find safety in Palestine despite the British limit on Jewish immigration they set off a more direct confrontation between the zionists and the British with Palestinians often targeted as well. The zionists you two things militarily they were stronger than the Palestinians and Britain was exhausted by World War Two, so it wouldn't have the same The stomach to keep fighting and Palestine, they were right in 1947 after 30 years of occupation ran announced, it was quitting Palestine and ask the newly formed United Nations to clean up its mess. All right, 1947 and 1948 are the most pivotal years in this story. So let's take a look at how things are lining up during British rule Jews. Had gone from 10% to 30% of the population. About 6% of the land under Ben-Gurion's leadership was the Jewish agency. 

Was pretty much functioning as a government for the Jewish community and the Zionist. Militias had tens of thousands of soldiers, modern weapons, and officers, who already fought in World War Two on the other side, the Palestinians hadn't been allowed to develop their own Administration or military, but as they waited for the UN solution, they were still the majority. All over the country in November 1947, the UN, then only made up of a fraction of the world's countries. Trees. It's a partition of Palestine. This plan marked off fifty five percent of the country for a Jewish state but the UN never explained how it could be a Jewish State when half the people in its territory were Palestinian to nobody's surprise Palestinians and in fact all Arabs rejected the un's plan Ben-Gurion and design leadership accepted. But they saw an opportunity with the British on the way out the Zionists, knew they would have the strongest military in Palestine, their forces were instructed to seize more territory than They've been awarded by the UN to do. What was necessary to reduce the number of Palestinians in it in cities like Haifa. The militia set off car bombs, and Palestinian neighborhoods they attacked Villages and forced residents out haguenau groups to drive them out of the beleaguered City taking many prisoners after inspecting parts of Western Jerusalem. That has been emptied of Palestinians Ben-Gurion said, in many Arab neighborhoods in the west he did not see even one Arab if we persist. It is Quite possible that in the next 6, or eight months, there will be considerable changes in the country and to our advantage. One of the events that helped speed up these changes took place on April 9th, 1948 when the village of Tioga scene was attacked. A British government report to the United Nations describes the scene where 250 people were killed in circumstances of great savagery, women and children were stripped and lined up. Aft. And then slaughtered by automatic firing. The story of what happened at Duty scene set off Panic all over the country as news. Spreading people fled fearing they would be next, historians have recorded dozens of similar mass occurrences during this period each time they would result in entire communities fleeing.  By the time. Britain ended its mandate on May 15th. 1948 250 thousand Palestinians had fled the night before David Ben-Gurion announced the founding of the state of Israel with himself as its first prime minister standing under a giant portrait of her soul. 51 years after her till had predicted this very moment. Design is malicious and came together as the newly formed. Israel Defense Forces, but the fighting wasn't over with the British out of the way, soldiers from several Arab countries entered Palestine. But the Israeli Army was better equipped, better organized and unlike the Arab armies had a unified command and backing from several European countries Israeli forces pushed into places that the UN had assigned to the Palestinian State. Like the towns of litha Andromeda 50,000 people were forced to flee from there. Many on foot in what became known as the lit. The death march after being emptied. The towns were given Hebrew names of logs and drums. I'm like, in many other Mt towns the buildings and homes were taken over by the new Israeli State and given to Jews by the time the UN secured an Armistice three-quarters of the Palestinian people have become refugees in Arabic. They call this the neck, but literally the catastrophe, the new state of Israel made up 78. 

Annexed by Scent of what had been Palestine. The remaining parts were annexed by Jordan or taken over by Egypt a year later. The UN passed a resolution calling for all Palestinian refugees to be allowed to return home, they never Palestine had been erased. In the decade since attempts to resolve this conflict have again tried to partition the land with each successive attempt, the territory offered to Palestinians in their historic Homeland shrinks even more. Ironically, Israel is still struggling to maintain the population advantage and gained in 1948 when it forced all those people out because in 1967 it occupied the West Bank and Gaza, bringing all the Palestinians living there under its Rule. And so today, the population of Jews and Non-jews in this land is roughly equal, but those living under occupation have no rights. No citizenship and no Prospect of Independence the neck of the era tactics of settlement home demolitions and expulsion are still used against them. Israel has taken the land but wants nothing to do with the millions under its rule International Israeli and Palestinian human rights groups. 

See if that's an accurate description of Israel, more than 100 years after Balfour's 100 years after Balfour's promise. Watch this video here.

https://youtu.be/kI_spMxp6t8?si=oO8gw5MF-b1GpCSl